Has making a pass at a woman just become illegal?

I often wonder what her mindset was/is.

Mental illness. The colourful hair (for both genders) is usually a dead giveaway nowadays so at least there's some sign of who not to bother with.

You're absolutely tapped if you have a go at anyone for doing something that's just a polite gesture. In fact, you're actively trying to make the world a more hostile place.
 
Last edited:
You seem obliged to mention her clothing, why? Are you saying her choice of what to wear had bearing on 3 (presumably men) stopping to speak to her, and being cat called was maybe due to her clothing? Can you describe or show it?

Whilst in an ideal world, one in which what someone wears causes zero prejudgement, we are in reality living in far from such a utopia, and what we wear has profound implications on how more general and immediate views are formed.

By ignoring such social idiosyncrasies it's sadly very easy to bring increased risks or prejudices upon oneself.

Just like the example someone earlier mentioned about wearing an expensive Rolex watch. If someone chooses to push the risk boundaries it can, even if it should not, have consequences.

To Cavalierly say to hell with that, I am wearing a prominently displayed £20,000 watch, or a short skirt, one makes the choice to potentially suffer adverse risks in modern society by putting your "wares" on public display. It would be nieve to dispute this.

Ah the old victim blaming, she was asking for it wearing that dress.
 
Given your posts in this thread I'm surprised you don't have a Michael Kors shaped dent in your face tbh.

Who the hell is Michael Kors? I have had a broken nose a couple of times, but not from some woman. First time I was probably looking for trouble and found it, second time my reactions were just too slow, an age thing. I have now realised I am far too old to fight, but I'm not too proud to consider paying someone else to do it for me ;)
 
Who the hell is Michael Kors? I have had a broken nose a couple of times, but not from some woman. First time I was probably looking for trouble and found it, second time my reactions were just too slow, an age thing. I have now realised I am far too old to fight, but I'm not too proud to consider paying someone else to do it for me ;)
Well 'Ard....
 
Mental illness. The colourful hair (for both genders) is usually a dead giveaway nowadays so at least there's some sign of who not to bother with.

You're absolutely tapped if you have a go at anyone for doing something that's just a polite gesture. In fact, you're actively trying to make the world a more hostile place.

That's a very impressive display of judgemental assumption and prejudice, all rolled together into one tasty ignorance sandwich.

People may dye their hair for any number of reasons, none of which start with "I have a mental illness".

You're interpretation of their dyed hair as being indicative of people suffering from Mental Health problems and using it as a "sign of who not to bother with" is frankly pure ignorance.

Since you mentioned it, how do you imagine people with genuine Mental Health problems (who may also dye their hair) are left feeling when people like you see and treat them like a leper or someone beneath you?



*Edit*
While I completely agree that having a go at someone for making a polite gesture (such as holding a door open) is utterly bonkers, I'm not sure that using hair colour to determine a person's mental state and treating them differently because of it is any less sane?!
 
Last edited:
I hold the door for anyone if they are close by, and i have never once had a negative reaction.

I imagine the amount of women who would genually kick up a fuss at having someone politely hold a door for them is infinitesimally small.
Same here, I suspect it's one of those things that may have happened a few times and the story of it has been filtered and spread as it frequently happening.
Or it's happening around certain people, who may or may not also be making comments.

It's like the stories of disabled people getting upset that someone has held a door open for them when they've been in a wheelchair, I've never come across that at all despite doing it a fair few times at the likes of the local hospital, GP's etc (and when people have done it for me when I've been pushing my mum or my dad I've always said thanks).
 
That's a very impressive display of judgemental assumption and prejudice, all rolled together into one tasty ignorance sandwich.

People may dye their hair for any number of reasons, none of which start with "I have a mental illness".

You're interpretation of their dyed hair as being indicative of people suffering from Mental Health problems and using it as a "sign of who not to bother with" is frankly pure ignorance.

Since you mentioned it, how do you imagine people with genuine Mental Health problems (who may also dye their hair) are left feeling when people like you see and treat them like a leper or someone beneath you?

You're one to talk when you're responding to people with GIFs because you can't believe this sort of thing happens.

The first point I made was obviously hyperbolic but I still stand by the fact you're tapped in the head if you have a go at someone for holding a door open.
 
Last edited:
Mental illness. The colourful hair (for both genders) is usually a dead giveaway nowadays so at least there's some sign of who not to bother with.

You're absolutely tapped if you have a go at anyone for doing something that's just a polite gesture. In fact, you're actively trying to make the world a more hostile place.
Lol

Most of the people I've met who have dyed their hair have done so for fun, or because they don't like their natural colour.

I'm guessing you have zero issues with people who dye their hair blonde, or who use hair dye to hide the fact they are going grey.
 
Welcome to my world.

My son was hilariously over the top on this a few years back, so I just used it to wind him up.

The highlight was when he told me he was "boycotting The Smiths, as Morrissey's views are problematic". When I asked him what, specifically, Morrissey had said, he didn't know. There was a bit of an awkward silence at that point...
Oh you have no idea the fun I have with this, I wind them up all the time.

The wife keeps telling them you know "he's winding you up right" but they just keep biting

I'm old school as they say, always pay for dinner etc but those days are gone.

Wife's friend is on a dating app, she goes on a lot of dates but was surprised to learn they always split the bill.

Thats the norm now I realise that but I always paid, I think I would rather be dating now than 30 years ago, would have saved a fortune
 
Lol

Most of the people I've met who have dyed their hair have done so for fun, or because they don't like their natural colour.

I'm guessing you have zero issues with people who dye their hair blonde, or who use hair dye to hide the fact they are going grey.

I'm glad someone see's what I was getting at. :)

The idea that because someone dye's their hair they can be "pre-judged" to having a Mental Illness is laughable and utterly ignorant of the truth.

Worse still is the (apparent) suggestion that those with Mental Illnesses are somehow "not worth bothering with", which for most suffers of Mental Illness is the most detrimental thing possible.

Plus as you rightly say, there are tens of thousands of people who dye their hair blonde their entire lives, or those who do it to cover up the grey - I wonder whether they are perceived as "worth bothering with" ?

Just bizarre. :confused: :confused:
 
The idea that because someone dye's their hair they can be "pre-judged" to having a Mental Illness is laughable and utterly ignorant of the truth.

You might want to go back and read my post. The two points are separate and I wasn't saying that anyone who dyes their hair has a mental illness.

It's funny how you've focused down on what was an obvious over-exaggeration on the green/purple haired feminazi meme.

deece9b9a80992ca481be8dc53c961e7.jpg
 
Last edited:
You might want to go back and read my post. The two points are separate and I wasn't saying that anyone who dyes their hair has a mental illness.

It's funny how you've focused down on what was an obvious over-exaggeration on the green/purple haired feminazi meme.

I did not "focus down on what was an obvious over-exaggeration on the green/purple haired feminazi meme"

I focused down on what you wrote...

You responded to a post describing an incident that occured to @rhobbyh where a short lady with purple hair got all loud at them for trying to hold open a door.

The clear assertion made in your post being that she likely had a Mental Illness and while that may or may not have been the case, you then went on to say...

The colourful hair (for both genders) is usually a dead giveaway nowadays so at least there's some sign of who not to bother with.

This is you, saying that "colourful hair" is a dead giveaway of a person suffering with a Mental Illness.

This is also you, saying that they should "not be bothered with".


Even if we ignore the bleached blondes and those covering up the grey, how else do you interpret the words you typed, in the order you typed them?
 
Last edited:
Mental illness. The colourful hair (for both genders) is usually a dead giveaway nowadays so at least there's some sign of who not to bother with.

That's a very impressive display of judgemental assumption and prejudice, all rolled together into one tasty ignorance sandwich.

People may dye their hair for any number of reasons, none of which start with "I have a mental illness".

You're interpretation of their dyed hair as being indicative of people suffering from Mental Health problems and using it as a "sign of who not to bother with" is frankly pure ignorance.

It's a bit ironic that you're having a go at this poster for something you claim is "pure ignorance" when you provide nothing with which to back up your claims. Note also he didn't claim that mental illness was necessarily the direct motivation for dying their hair, that people dye their hair for any number of reasons doesn't negate the possibility of an association such as one the other poster believes exists.


Has anyone studied this? Apparently so:

Results show many points of interest. First, in the simplest models that include only our key variables of self-presentation, we see that unnatural hair colour predicts mental illness with a moderately large effect size, β = -0.33, and there is also a notable effect size for vegetarianism, β = -0.31. This relationship may exist due to vegetarianism being an expression of a need for a strong identity or perhaps because a high level of anxiety extends to anxiety about harm to animals. Having tattoos is comparatively a much weaker signal, with effect sizes estimated around -0.10. Across the models, we add progressively more potential confounder, such as age, sex and sexual orientation, political ideology and so on. However, we see that despite the inclusion of so any controls, unnatural hair colour remains a fairly potent predictor of mental illness, with an effect size in the final model of β = -0.23.

So who is actually the ignorant one here? @Ayahuasca or @Devilman
 
Last edited:
The clear assertion made in your post being that she likely had a Mental Illness and while that may or may not have been the case, you then went on to say...

No, the assertion made is that she likely had a mental illness based on the way she rudely responded to @rhobbyh for simply holding the door open.

The purple hair colour point was a separate one in what can often be a telltale sign for someone who is going to give you grief for doing so based off the memes.
 
It's a bit ironic that you're having a go at this poster for something you claim is "pure ignorance" when you provide nothing with which to back up your claims. Note also he didn't claim that mental illness was necessarily the direct motivation for dying their hair, that people dye their hair for any number of reasons doesn't negate the possibility of an association such as one the other poster believes exists.


Has anyone studied this? Apparently so:



So who is actually the ignorant one here? @Ayahuasca or @Devilman
Don't bring your factual studies into this, you'll offend the poor bloke
 
Back
Top Bottom