• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Have you run Winrar Cpu Bench Mark?

rarmark.jpg



2.7 ghz opteron 165 win vista 64

sucky score. :(
 
I just ran this quickly and only got 822 kbps.

I'm running an E4300 @ 3.2GHz with the RAM 1:1 at 712MHz 4,4,4,12 T2 on 32-bit Vista. Does that sound about right? Looks a little low?

Is Vista the problem or should I unlink the RAM and run it on say a 4:5 ratio (853MHz)?

james32 said:
e6400 @ 3200
memory timings 4.4.4.12
1520
That's almost double with the same CPU speed and same RAM timings, T1 rather than T2? Is that on Vista James?
 
Last edited:
Quad QX6700 @ 2.67 1407

This seems slow :( compared to other results here

Did a comparison with another computer I have LOL

Athlon 2000XP @1.667 145
 
Last edited:
Samuri said:
Quad QX6700 @ 2.67 1407

This seems slow :( compared to other results here

Did a comparison with another computer I have LOL

Athlon 2000XP @1.667 145


I just tried mine at stock at got 1560

Probably just more processes open on yours?
 
1346,
X2 4800+ @ 12*237 (2850). ram at 259 3-3-3-8-1T
Win XP

seems to be very picky on memory latency/speed. i got 1283 with ram at 237 same cpu....

swapping to 512mb sticks, same cpu ram @ 237 3-2-2-6-1T everything else the same : 1318
 
Last edited:
Some of the c2d results are odd, i score 1600+ in this and seeing people with 400mhz faster overclocks scoring lower. Maybe the memory strap kicking in anyone know?
 
Dingleberry88 said:
850

That's on my laptop:

1.66GHz C2D
2GB RAM
5400RPM HDD



It'll be interesting to see what my ageing desktop gets.
That's a little more than my C2D @ 3.2GHz! What gives?
 
Back
Top Bottom