Didn’t even think of octopus, I have just asked for an evaluation from them to see what the deal is.
I'd love to get a heat pump but I think the financial case only stacks up if you're going to be in the property long term, which I won't be.
Yes, I think they all need a water tank as a thermal store, what I meant is that the domestic hot water tank (ie for the hot taps) can also act as a thermal store in addition to the small tank that comes with the ASHP. Especially if the system includes solar thermal or a solar diverter into the DHW tank.I'm fairly confident that heat pumps require a thermal store to work. I don't think you can have one without. But my experience is on the commercial side of things so I guess domestic might be different.
Exactly. The reality is that if you have a poorly performing house, it will just take longer to heat up at lower flow temperatures, which is what heat pumps put out. But that's the same with a highly insulated or a poorly insulated building, just the time taken will be longer in the latter example.
You can use the whole long term excuse around any home improvement - why would you bother investing the time or money for someone else to enjoy it?
That's ultimately why our housing stock is so poor, no one wants to be the one to spend any money on it.
Watching the response to this one with popcorn ready . I'm on the fence, but they are very expensive compared to a boiler.I used to work on and install big uns. The size of houses.
Just don't.
They are expensive to buy, expensive to install, expensive to maintain, noisy, less efficient in cold weather, and they fall apart pretty fast too. Overall, the savings on a small installation are questionable.
I would wait, at the moment, to see where things go.
No. The MCS regs are actually quite specific about this point. The ‘seasonal’ is quite specific in the term ‘seasonal coefficient of performance’ in that it’s an average across all seasons.The way they all advertise them is what makes me so suspicious of them.
They all boast how efficient they are when it's warm outdoors, but then seem to hide the fact they pretty much don't work when it's cold and you know need heating.
See the link above that just says cold season 102% efficient. That's what I'm going on about.No. The MCS regs are actually quite specific about this point. The ‘seasonal’ is quite specific in the term ‘seasonal coefficient of performance’ in that it’s an average across all seasons.
As we have already established, the issue is that many domestic heating installers (gas and otherwise) don’t understand the design principles of heating systems and how to make them efficient. These principles are exactly the same between gas and heat pumps. The heat source is actually irrelevant to this point.
The reality is a plenty of gas heating systems are grossly oversized and have poor implementations so they operate well below the efficiency they are capable of in the real world. No one seems to be worried about that one though.
Just reading an advert for some Heat Pump units and it states in colder conditions efficiency is 102% is that it, so a couple of percent more than a basic electric heater?
What do they class as colder climates I guess is the important bit.
Worcester Bosch launches new series of high-flow monobloc heat pumps
Worcester Bosch's new residential heat pumps are available in several versions, with output ranging from 4 kW to 30 KW. It says the new products can be cascaded up to six units.www.pv-magazine.com
No. The MCS regs are actually quite specific about this point. The ‘seasonal’ is quite specific in the term ‘seasonal coefficient of performance’ in that it’s an average across all seasons.
As we have already established, the issue is that many domestic heating installers (gas and otherwise) don’t understand the design principles of heating systems and how to make them efficient. These principles are exactly the same between gas and heat pumps. The heat source is actually irrelevant to this point.
The reality is a plenty of gas heating systems are grossly oversized and have poor implementations so they operate well below the efficiency they are capable of in the real world. No one seems to be worried about that one though.
I’m pretty sure that is referring to lifetime costs. £1k over 15+ years is not exactly significant."Heat pumps are usually worth the investment. An air source heat pump will typically save you £1,840 over its lifetime, compared to a gas boiler – which means you can actually cut your costs by going green."
See that doesn't add up either, so spending many thousands might save me two thousand. That's some maths that.
I’ll keep a quiet eye on them and if they become value for money I'll get one. I wonder if you legally allowed to fit them yourself.
They've just announced their own brand of heat pumps:Didn’t even think of octopus, I have just asked for an evaluation from them to see what the deal is.
I know what I'm doing I did my own central heating. Can do my own electrical stuff as well no problem there.I’m pretty sure that is referring to lifetime costs. £1k over 15+ years is not exactly significant.
In theory yes, no F gas is required because it’s mono block but you can’t install the required unvented water cylinder yourself due to building regs. That would need signing off, as would any electrical work.
Also see the point above about actually needed to know what you are doing to make it work.
Pretty much all sensible low carbon water heating options require a thermal store of some kind.I know what I'm doing I did my own central heating. Can do my own electrical stuff as well no problem there.
The need for a cylinder I want aware of though I won't be going back to one of those, no where to put one anymore.