No I don't. I've said consitently that the medical profession knows more. My issue is putting it into law that the government can mandate what evidence it chooses to support from the medical profession as a blanket approach for all children. I fully support parents listening to the medical profession. I fully support the courts being used for individual cases where it is felt the child is in danger through action or inaction by their parents. But I don't support blanket decisions by the State on children where I do feel that most parents would act sensibly.
I think history has proven that parents are not capable of acting sensibly, look at what happened when Dr Fraud published his falsified link between MMR and autism. That makes for a very compelling case for government mandated vaccination in and of itself.
Your suggested approach makes no sense, if we accept that not giving the vaccine puts the child in danger then employing a judge would be moot, simply costing huge amounts of money and resulting in many more children being killed by diseases while legal processes go through.