MuSsEr said:should still be covered by 3 years with hiper tho right?
I don't suppose they cover for other parts of the PC they blew up as well do they?
Failures have never been the problem, the problem is out of those failures a significant number of them have caused damage to system components, compared to none for the seasonics.Telescopi said:Hiper is around the middle in terms of failures per 1000 sold - less failures than seasonic.
Thankfully they won't because they are built by seasonic. If they weren't then they wouldn't be recommended because they are an unknown psu brand, but what they actually are is a seasonic with some better parts, a quieter fan and a longer warranty.Justintime said:Just wait until the Corsairs start setting things on fire![]()
![]()
I'd go for the Corsair hx 620, for reasons mentioned above.MuSsEr said:I'm looking at the 620watt enermax liberty (SLI, modular etc) is this PSU any good, anyone got one?
Joe42 said:If more seasonics fail then you would expect to see more reports of seasonic failures on here than reports of hiper failures, you don't because the seasonics never take out components, so people just rma them without a problem.
I've had a seasonic fail on me, i'll still buy and recommend them. I wouldn't buy a hiper if you paid me.
Thankfully they won't because they are built by seasonic. If they weren't then they wouldn't be recommended because they are an unknown psu brand, but what they actually are is a seasonic with some better parts, a quieter fan and a longer warranty.
.
Joe42 said:I'd go for the Corsair hx 620, for reasons mentioned above.
As i said, the corsairs are seasonics, and seasonic have been around for a very long time. Forget its a corsair, corsair only brand them and sell them. Its a seasonic.MuSsEr said:not going for the corsairs...also for the reasons mentioned above, in that yeah everyone raves about them, but they did the same for hiper and look what happened to that...
i.e. corsairs longevity has not been tested
where as enermax are a respected brand and have been around for a while
No, failure rates are lower than seasonics. And if it does fail, its certainly not guaranteed to kill components either. But there is a small probability that it might.seth said:So its just a matter of time till my hiper 580 kicks the bucket, oh joy!
Seasonic have been making PC psus for over 25 years. They are one of if not the oldest Pc psu company there is.Nickg said:but when did seasonic come onto the scene? not that long ago - certainly not enough for the RMA's to be dribblign throuhg like the Hipers.
my Hiper R 580w was kay - till it went and only took itself out - thankfully! but i have had it over 18months. how many seasonics out there are 2years old+?
Joe42 said:Seasonic have been making PC psus for over 25 years. They are one of if not the oldest Pc psu company there is.
There are millions of seasonics out there over 2 years old.
Its not the rmas that are the problem either, all brands of psus have a failure rate, the problem is that a significant number of Hiper psus have killed components when they died and i've yet to hear of a seasonic doing that.
Well, heres a review of one from 2002 that looks like an enthusiast model to me.Nickg said:seasonic have been going a while but only lately in the enthousiast scene AFAICR. they certainly werent in the picture years ago in this area when i ws in the market fr a psu, hence why everyone bought TAGAN and Enermax, and Hiper at the time. now they are in this arena and we will see in a year or two how many last the duration.
Seasonic said:2003 Launched retail products with own brandname and won awards and recommendation worldwide.
Joe42 said:Anyway, i don't see why it matters which has been around longest, many Hipers have killed components, no seasonics ever have. End of.
You can search the forums if you like.Telescopi said:and 99% of statistics are made up on the spot?
Trusted Reviews said:It is very hard to recommend a product that fails during testing and the Hiper Type R just doesn’t cut it. Although it has a few minor flaws, it seems to be a poor PSU, as it was the only one that failed after the stress test. More worryingly this was only at 436W, not even close to the rated 580W. To kick it while it’s down, the Type R didn’t pass the Hi-POT tests either, even though it is rated for it.
Now you could argue that that was sample variance, however as i said i've heard of many people on here having components fried by them, so it clearly isn't.Trusted Reviews said:However, 20 minutes into the 75 per cent load stress test the Type R started to behave rather oddly. What happened could only be descried as a minor disaster and we almost had to cancel the whole test. Although the Type R passed the stress test, it switched itself off a couple of minutes. Far worse though, it had managed to damage the test equipment we where using! Luckily the engineers managed to repair it after a couple of hours, but it was one problem we hadn’t expected to come across.
At this stage we thought it was the test equipment that had failed, but plugging the Type R back in after the equipment had been fixed showed up a grounding fault in the PSU.
Does it matter how they repaired their test equipment?Nickg said:how do you repair damaged equipment like that? would have thought they would have to send back to Hiper and have them ship another? sounds like a strange review.
Who cares about failures? I don't, at least not until it becomes disproportionate.my point stands though - hiper R 580 was here before seasonics offerings. the hiper was popular so you get a lot of failures. the seasonic was higher ASP at the time and more of a premium product so ulikely to get as many failures - as less out in field and higher quality to begin with.