Poll: Hodgson, should he stay or should he go.

Hodgson, time to go?

  • Yes get rid of the owl faced buffoon

    Votes: 126 57.5%

  • No keep the senile old bugger

    Votes: 93 42.5%
  • Total voters
    219
Stay. I think there are signs England are improving. Our passing accuracy and possession have improved greatly and he's giving some of the youngsters a chance.
 
Go. He's a delusional clown and shouldn't be allowed anywhere near a top club side or International team ranked in the top 50.

He's incredibly lucky he's English because a foreign manager wouldn't get away with the records he's broken recently.
 
Stay - definite signs of improvement albeit a disappointing exit. Just need to stop picking players on merit going forward. Now that (more than likely) the Gerrards, Lampards etc are moving along we will be seeing the fresh blood blending together.
 
Go. I just don't rate him much as a manager, however unified the dressing room may be (look how well that turned out).
 
Go. He's ****ing useless and should have never got the job. He loves Suarez now though, keeping the attention off just how bad a job he's done.
 
AGD said:
Stay. I think there are signs England are improving. Our passing accuracy and possession have improved greatly and he's giving some of the youngsters a chance.
Click to expand...

Holland in this World Cup are the second worst team for giving the ball away.

Possession is one thing, doing something with that possessions is another, just look at Spain.
 
Dont think he is that good, but with this has to be viable alternatives ( with the experience to count) which limts the choice drastically.....unless you imclude Johnny foreigner lol
 
Not sure it would really make a difference, besides giving the players an excuse for failing miserably.

Who'd want to coach England anyhow?
 
Hmm in isolation his strategies seem sound and the tactics within them well thought out, the game itself seems to have left him behind though its almost like hes playing 2 almost 3 decades old football.

It was almost like he was a deer in the headlights in that game againt Uruguay, they closed his plan down and he just didn't seem to know how to respond and wasted the first 70 minutes of the game completely. Compare to i.e. Klinnsman in similar circumstances he was on his feet, switching to plan B, doing his utmost to push his team on.

Also while he doesn't have the greatest squad to work with there is plenty of talent there, other managers have done much more with much less, at the end of the day his **** job is to utilise the options available to him to the best they can be used and hes completely and utterly failing to do so.

I don't think he should go as such, on certain levels he is brilliant, but I think he should be assisting someone who is more in touch with todays football and capable of applying a more dynamic style of management.
 
Last edited:
Bear in mind that the FA would probably have to pay him significant compensation is they wanted to fire him.
 
Stay. I'm fed up of the constant 'oh we have to change manager because we have lost something' mentality.

The F.A have given him until 2016 for a reason.
 
Absolutely should go, his after match interviews tell you everything. Reminds me of the crap Moyes was spouting on a weekly basis.
 
I think he should stay. "We" blame the manager after every tournament.. It's about time the players took the blame for once. They are all better than the performances than they put in for England, and all people keep doing is giving them excuses.
 
[TW]Sponge;26508449 said:
Stay. I'm fed up of the constant 'oh we have to change manager because we have lost something' mentality.

The F.A have given him until 2016 for a reason.
Click to expand...

Nothing will change unless he becomes more proactive? or something, that Uruguay game his strategy was running into the same dead end over and over like a fly trying to get through a pane of glass in a window and about as stupid and that went on for ~70 minutes before he really tried to do anything different - any manager worth a **** would have been on their feet after 20-25 minutes max of that and trying to change things up.
 
Rroff said:
Nothing will change unless he becomes more proactive? or something, that Uruguay game his strategy was running into the same dead end over and over like a fly trying to get through a pane of glass in a window and about as stupid and that went on for ~70 minutes before he really tried to do anything different - any manager worth a **** would have been on their feet after 20-25 minutes max of that and trying to change things up.
Click to expand...

I would say it's the players fault rather than the managers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom