How are prescriptions checked?

Do you think that maybe it should be changed so that the prescription states whether it's free or not?

Prescriptions are all printed out now. Surely it wouldn't be too hard to integrate into the database an exemption check without leaving it to the morals of the patient.

That way you have prove to the surgery when you register if you're exempt.

Your doctor doesn't have access to that kind of information. Also exemptions can change all the time depending on your circumstances and there are a myriad of reasons why you might be exempt.

I don't think it is as easy as having to offer proof to the pharmacist off your benefit entitlement or exemption.
 
I said "Wow, that's nearly £50" She responded "Yeah, but I just tick the box and get them for free"

:eek:
You should have called the Police and handed your friend in!

It is a shame that given the chance to be honest and knowing that resources on the NHS are already stretched that she does this. I would probably just have a word if a friend of mine did that and owned up to me.
 
:eek:
You should have called the Police and handed your friend in!

It is a shame that given the chance to be honest and knowing that resources on the NHS are already stretched that she does this. I would probably just have a word if a friend of mine did that and owned up to me.

Mate,

All I would get would be "Oh you're alright, they dont cost you a penny, so keep out of it"

Mmm...........Maybe I need new friends.
 
:eek:
You should have called the Police and handed your friend in!

It is a shame that given the chance to be honest and knowing that resources on the NHS are already stretched that she does this. I would probably just have a word if a friend of mine did that and owned up to me.

Yeah, because that's what friends do, they call the police.
 
I wouldn't mind paying a bit, but £8+ which it is now is completely and utterly ridiculous imo.

It should be a flat fee per prescription, not per item.

Why?
Many prescription items cost quite a bit more than £8 if you had to pay outright.
If it was £8 per prescription rather than item, either the NHS would be in even worse a mess than now, or taxes would go up.
 
Why?
Many prescription items cost quite a bit more than £8 if you had to pay outright.
If it was £8 per prescription rather than item, either the NHS would be in even worse a mess than now, or taxes would go up.

I just think it's harsh to expect people to pay through the nose to treat a medical condition which is no fault of their own when they already pay tax and NI.
 
I just think it's harsh to expect people to pay through the nose to treat a medical condition which is no fault of their own when they already pay tax and NI.

To expect People living in England to pay...but to be fair, the cost of a yearly prescription card is hardly prohibitive whereas the costs to the NHS can be.

As long as those in need get the assistance they need I have no issue paying prescription charges.
 
I am exempt (long term medical condition) and renew my prescription every 6 weeks. Over the last few years I've only been asked to produce my exemption card a couple of times.
 
The NHSBSA have very recently started to undertake additional eligibility checking on a random sample of prescriptions. I believe this is cross checked with DWP data and/or other sources.

When prescriptions are processed, no patient identifiable information is captured so it would only be through the random sample that you could be found out. Over 40 million prescription items are processed in England every month. The chance of your prescription being randomly sampled is very small.

However, defrauding the NHS is wrong.
 
Your doctor doesn't have access to that kind of information. Also exemptions can change all the time depending on your circumstances and there are a myriad of reasons why you might be exempt.

I don't think it is as easy as having to offer proof to the pharmacist off your benefit entitlement or exemption.

Pretty much it I think.

I suspect that at some point the government will link the pharmacists systems up to a benefits DB to let them check, as I think the pharmacists are starting to move towards getting prescriptions direct from the GP's (I'm sure I saw something about "connected pharmacists" or similar at my chemists, but may be completely wrong as to what it was for).

When I was exempt it was a case of filling in the box on the prescription, I can't remember being asked for proof (although my dentist required a note).
 
Pretty much it I think.

I suspect that at some point the government will link the pharmacists systems up to a benefits DB to let them check, as I think the pharmacists are starting to move towards getting prescriptions direct from the GP's (I'm sure I saw something about "connected pharmacists" or similar at my chemists, but may be completely wrong as to what it was for).

When I was exempt it was a case of filling in the box on the prescription, I can't remember being asked for proof (although my dentist required a note).

In an ideal world this would be the case but the information governance arrangements would be immense. GP practices and GP practice computer systems are all private companies.
 
Scotland thought it was fair, why can't we?

I'm not disputing that, but how Scotland or Wales adjust their NHS budgets doesn't mean that care is any better for it. Figures show that even though the English NHS spends less per head than the other UK devolved health care systems, it actually has better Health outcomes.

There is also the issue of scale, population size impacts the costs enormously, which I suspect is your answer.
 
Back
Top Bottom