Soldato
- Joined
- 19 May 2005
- Posts
- 6,896
I'm not sure how they check (I'd assume via national insurance number) but I knew someone that got caught out with the dentist.
Do you think that maybe it should be changed so that the prescription states whether it's free or not?
Prescriptions are all printed out now. Surely it wouldn't be too hard to integrate into the database an exemption check without leaving it to the morals of the patient.
That way you have prove to the surgery when you register if you're exempt.
I said "Wow, that's nearly £50" She responded "Yeah, but I just tick the box and get them for free"
You should have called the Police and handed your friend in!
It is a shame that given the chance to be honest and knowing that resources on the NHS are already stretched that she does this. I would probably just have a word if a friend of mine did that and owned up to me.
You should have called the Police and handed your friend in!
It is a shame that given the chance to be honest and knowing that resources on the NHS are already stretched that she does this. I would probably just have a word if a friend of mine did that and owned up to me.
Yeah, because that's what friends do, they call the police.
Depends on how big the reward is.
Depends on how big the reward is.
For some perhaps. For me it would entirely depend on the crime committed and even then I would try to get them to do the right thing themselves first.
I wouldn't mind paying a bit, but £8+ which it is now is completely and utterly ridiculous imo.
It should be a flat fee per prescription, not per item.
Why?
Many prescription items cost quite a bit more than £8 if you had to pay outright.
If it was £8 per prescription rather than item, either the NHS would be in even worse a mess than now, or taxes would go up.
That was a tongue in cheek comment. I feel you may have taken it a tad too literal.![]()
I just think it's harsh to expect people to pay through the nose to treat a medical condition which is no fault of their own when they already pay tax and NI.
Your doctor doesn't have access to that kind of information. Also exemptions can change all the time depending on your circumstances and there are a myriad of reasons why you might be exempt.
I don't think it is as easy as having to offer proof to the pharmacist off your benefit entitlement or exemption.
Pretty much it I think.
I suspect that at some point the government will link the pharmacists systems up to a benefits DB to let them check, as I think the pharmacists are starting to move towards getting prescriptions direct from the GP's (I'm sure I saw something about "connected pharmacists" or similar at my chemists, but may be completely wrong as to what it was for).
When I was exempt it was a case of filling in the box on the prescription, I can't remember being asked for proof (although my dentist required a note).
Scotland thought it was fair, why can't we?