So why did you say this then:
No wonder I am having difficulty when you have, in the space of one page, said two very different things!
Really, I thought you were more intelligent than to assume a context that wasn't stated. The NHS currently offers treatments that do not necessarily treat an illness or injury, things like IVF should be offered under certain circumstances dependent on the health and wellbeing of the individual, not to accommodate a lifestyle choice, some things should not be offered under the umbrella of universal healthcare ...I thought that was plainly obvious, I really shouldn't have to explain this to be honest, even a child could understand it.
In any case it is still opposed to your idea that healthcare should be available only (mostly) at a cost to the individual. I hold the opposite view, that healthcare (as defined as treatment necessary for the health and wellbeing of the individual both physically and mentally) should be free at point of contact.
My mistake.