Difference in our opinions is yours is beyond deluded. Buildings from crysis 2? Where exactly? You honestly think Dice aren't competant enough to make their own models? The games been in the works over 3 years, call me mad but im pretty sure thats ample time for the 3d artists to make some buildings up in 3ds.
I agree, I've heard many users witter on about how the realism looks similar to "Crysis". What many users do not seem to understand is that when game developers strive for realism you end up with more or less the same results with variations, strange that huh?
Weapons from MOH, wow who woulda thought a modern day shooter might have some of the same loadout, doesn't matter if thats what they actually use in real life or not, in dg's universe theyre obviously "Copying" just to help his shred of an argument. Obviously Day of Defeat was copying Allied Assault in utilising some of the same WW2 era weapons. Ive also a sneaking suspicion that the fact that these weapons fire Bullets, might also be copied from somewhere..
Medal Of Honor - Frostbite 1.5 & UT Engine 3
Battfiled 3 - Frostbite 2.0
I have no doubt the weapons in Medal Of Honor have found themselves on Battlefield 3 and I see no problem with that. Why develop the same guns twice? Give them a quick update and you've saved time to work on other areas of the game.
And the only comparison you can come up with for movement is you can see your body while vaulting over walls so that automatically says its "copying" Mirrors edge? Hate to break it to you sonny, but Hells Highway also had a vaulting system where you could see your legs. And even years before that Allied Assault originally you could look down and see your legs, it was later removed due to clipping issues. Looking down and seeing your legs is nothing new, just rarely used, and thats the only thing that you can tie the movement to mirrors edge, when its been done long before.
Well how many different ways can you move? "Damn and I thought Battlefield 3 was original, another rip off of Call of Duty."
Hit reg is MOH? Not really, BC2 had a lot more going on in it than MOH ever had, MOH also had weapons where you didn't have to take into account distance or bullet drop, or lead targets much at all so it was much easier to hit targets. At the very most they seem to have improved the network code, im sure thats pretty standard fare considering the complaints that the netcode in BC2 got.
Personally I felt Medal Of Honor was a terrible game but I only played single player and that was developed on the Unreal Engine 3. Bullet drop in Bad Company 2 is amazing, to get a bang on head shots at distances you wouldn't even have to think about in Call of Duty is what I define skill.
Don't get me wrong I'm not bashing Call of Duty and I'm an avid player on Modern Warfare 2 and I enjoy both thoroughly. There two different games and Call of Duty is aimed to be a fast playing game, Battlefield I'd consider a light military simulator.
understand your op its just differs from mine
weapons are rejigged moh guns
the movement leaping vaulting is from another dice game called mirrors edge whether you agree or not on tha its truth and i know it is
You said it yourself, "another
DICE game".
hit reg is moh based sorry to tell you not bfbc2.
if you understood why they are using moh hitreg you may have a chance . if you dont understand why moh hit reg is being used its to speed up the game so its more cod like . quicker more kills entertaining audience more equals cod money. which is ten times what bf makes currently. moh had the best hitreg in ages in any fps game.
I don't have facts for you, but when you actually play the game it's taking great inspiration from Bad Company and whilst many would argue its not, I'd be very surprised if I was wrong. The similarities are quiet clearly obvious and personally that's a good thing.
i have played bf3 more than you and before anyone was even thinking of playing it on here
. so keep deluding yourself and ill keep deluding myself
im not a cod fan boy either i play both bf and cod
or any other game i consider to be good.
Whilst I'm fairly new here, sorry but I do believe you're a blatant liar. Dice released the game as Alpha, not beta/demo so how you "know" so much about the game is beyond me. I didn't realise you was a developer in DICE!
It's not a competition and quiet frankly I don't care that you played Battlefield 3 more than any of us. It doesn't mean anything and your statement about playing Battlefield 3 "before anyone was even thinking about playing" Battlefield 3 tells me you're a blatant liar.
Because maybe then you could be taken seriously instead of being one of many people coming upto a games release that suddenly has "insider info".
Happens all the time, people suddenly being "in the know" and 99% of the time its nothing but Lip Service.
No need to think about it, the typical story is "someone you know" or a "family member" etc has access to it. Heard it plenty of times before, hardly impossible but as i said, 99% of the time its BS, it is the internet after all.
+1 There is too many users like him scattered across the internet with insider knowledge. DG, you're not fooling any of us with your lies.
As for the main topic of the thread, I think guy is simply bashing and advertising alternatives. Propaganda springs to mind.
hope that helps the halfwits in the thread 
