Soldato
- Joined
- 5 Aug 2003
- Posts
- 8,496
- Location
- Essex
Seems Ram plays a big part in this, just tried it again, with the cpu overclocked to 3ghz and it was 4 seconds faster.
Anyone got these times regarding a Q6600 not overclocked nor is using a raid setup and using 2gig ram
Well worth a 400 quid upgrade from a 37 second 4400+ then?
It's worth it for many reasons, not just shaving Photoshop time in half
RAW photo editing is like you're saving a full quality JPEG on a dual core system, it is so fast!
Now you see the reason I want a upgrade is for lightroom performance with large quantities of RAWs in my catalogue.
I am holding my expectations high that browsing through my lightroom database will be smooth and cached fast.
My RAWs are never processed outside lightroom. Photoshop opens a full res Tiff which I don't really care about since my production is 90% only touched within lightroom.
Its looking like a worthwhile upgrade as I can't afford to go for a Mac only setup as soon as I like and with my motherboard dying Im gonna have to get it replaced anyway.
Should be a nice upgrade, I did a quick fraps video to show you just how fast RAW images process. The steps in the video are loading the raws in ACR, quickly apply CTRL+U to auto adjust levels then open both in CS2
http://robbiekhan.co.uk/root/videos/raw_performance_quad_core.wmv
Also the same reason i'm upgradingNow you see the reason I want a upgrade is for lightroom performance with large quantities of RAWs in my catalogue.