Soldato
- Joined
- 20 Feb 2004
- Posts
- 4,028
- Location
- Blyth, Northumberland
RSH said:At the end of the day, its the same argument as..... half full/half empty.
its just personal perception.
I see your point. But it's one sandwich
RSH said:At the end of the day, its the same argument as..... half full/half empty.
its just personal perception.
Whitewater said:I see your point. But it's one sandwich
Matallica said:Any sort of conclusion/agreement been made yet ?
Yeah. Its 2.Matallica said:Any sort of conclusion/agreement been made yet ?
Management terminology. Lose it.RSH said:At the end of the day,
No, that one's much easier. If you're in the process of filling it, its half-full. If you're emptying it, its half-empty. There is no optimist/pessimist approach.RSH said:its the same argument as..... half full/half empty.
Matallica said:Any sort of conclusion/agreement been made yet ?
Gilly said:Yeah. Its 2.
Raist said:Management terminology. Lose it.
Raist said:^ heh heh. Cute drawing.
But, judging from your pic, I would say you made one sandwich and cut it in half rather than make two sandwiches there. Surely you didn't draw out the two halves seperately.
neil3k said:Geordies dont have this problem because we generally eat stottie sandwiches.
Al Vallario said:Can't see where you lot are going wrong
D.P. said:with out reading 14 pages of sympatic madness, i'll add my 2p worth (that is 1 whole 2 ps, not 2 1ps)
What if you buttered only a single slice of bread, put a filling in. folded it it in half/ cut it in half and folded over.
Would that somehow not be a sandwich?
No, it is still a sandwich, but a 1-slice sandwich
Thereby, a 2-slice sandwich cut in half becomes 2 1-slice sandwiches.
That actually works nicely.Whitewater said:Let:
S = Sandwich,
B = 1 Slice of Bread,
F = Filling.
2B + F = S.
S / 2 <> 2S.