• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

HUB: Intel 13700K vs AMD 7800X3D

Of course you wouldn’t, but a technology gulf has opened between AMD and Intel.

Intel must have optimised the hell out of Warzone to get the performance difference between AMD and Intel so accurately reflected.
The link you posted was for Intel GPUs. In warzone a 7900xtx is faster than a 4090. So yeah, very accurate results.

Anyways, as I've said, it's not a gulf, AMD is only 1 generation behind. Not that big a deal
 
The card is at 98% usage man...it has nothing to do with the cpu, else dlss wouldn't help would it?

Frame chasers is irrelevant here last time we tested a stock 12900k had better lows than your 7950x 3d.

What? that's everything to do with the CPU, it means the CPU is fast enough to drive the GPU to its fullest extent, if you're getting less than thatwith a similar performance GPU its because you have a CPU bottleneck.
 
Can you replicate Frame Chasers numbers?
Which ones? Can you post a video?

I've tried a couple of months ago in warzone 2, he was testing a 13900k, he was getting lower 1% lows than me on my 12900k - but that's most likely due to ram and him turning off ecores which really help in this game.
 
But you didn't seem to like the answer. I can post you a video in warzone 2 and you can see that it really uses those ecores instead of HT when you have them on.

Your answer was no.
I can show you the way, but you may not like the answer... :cool:
Step 1 - Never, I repeat never, listen to Frame Chasers on anything AMD. :p
Step 2 - Buy a 7950X3D, and tune memory, FCLK and curve optimiser. Cheap Hynix M die is all you need, 5200Mhz speed or higher will do. No need to overclock the CPU using BCLK, stock will do. ;)
Step 3 - Result!
l3y4R4h.gif

To add to this.

Step 4 - Never, I repeat never, listen to Frame Chasers on anything Intel.
:p
 
How many side jobs did you have to take on to cover such a chasm in running costs? Should've just stuck with AMD and use the money to invest.

The difference in power use is costing Intel hundreds of millions per quarter. How much of that lost revenue gets passed on to the user…
 
Isn’t intel rumoured to be getting another cpu on the LGA1700?

would be interesting to see the power difference if intel were on TSMC 5nm as everyone thought AMDs gpu architecture was much more efficient than Nvidia when they had the node advantage but then when Nvidia jumped to the superior node the tables turned quite dramatically.

Intel are supposed to be promoting their own fabs, is this them admitting they can't even get their own products to work efficiently when built in their own fabs?
Also, Intel can't turn a profit on their CPU's when they build them themselves, hows that going to work when the pay TSMC to fabricate them? Do they think they can ramp the price up?
 
Last edited:
Intel are supposed to be promoting their own fabs, is this them admitting they can't even get their own products to work efficiently when built in their own fabs?
Also, Intel can't turn a profit on their CPU's when they build them themselves, hows that going to work when the pay TSMC to fabricate them? Do they think they can ramp the price up?

The real pain for Intel will be once AMD release its 16c 32t CCD parts. Intel will need massively increase the Atom core count to complete in non gaming tasks, but will be horribly hindered across a gaming benchmark suite as not many titles will scale past 16 Ryzen cores.

Intel engineers explaining the Skylake + Atom roadmap
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DRqozUNeL4A&pp=ygUhYSBrbmlnaHQncyB0YWxlIHBhaW4gbG90cyBvZiBwYWlu
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom