Soldato
In the video he posted he was actually consuming more energy. Facts
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
HUB: Intel 13700K vs AMD 7800X3D
- Thread starter humbug
- Start date
Caporegime
Yeah I know, it uses about 0.6 - 1% of cpu cycles, and costs at least 1ns in latency but needs must. I’ve got two Corsair commander pro’s installed and connected via two usb ports handling RGB of 9 fans too.Man, you running iCue? Did not expect that from you
It increases mem latency by a couple of ns. Remove that crap
Same as Steam, but you can't play without it so, w/e
Soldato
Had similar kind of setup running but I just sold the whole setup with rgbs and whatnot, went to air cooling.Yeah I know, it uses about 0.6 - 1% of cpu cycles, and costs at least 1ns in latency but needs must. I’ve got two Corsair commander pro’s installed and connected via two usb ports handling RGB of 9 fans too.
Intel doesn't need AIOs, a small air cooler does fine, so no need
Caporegime
I might ditch RGB on my next build for Zen 5 tbf and move to a different AIO, even though performance wise this one is great.Had similar kind of setup running but I just sold the whole setup with rgbs and whatnot, went to air cooling.
Intel doesn't need AIOs, a small air cooler does fine, so no need
On Vondel the best I have is 340 average and 150 1% lows. Hopefully my memory tuned will get me closer to your results.
Edit! I didn’t start my 1% etc in the plane. I’m getting more like 260fps. That is a very great score @LtMatt.
Last edited:
Soldato
@LtMatt
Here is the video I promised. Didn't test new map but Al Mazrah since it's the worst case scenario. Highlighted CPU power draw with bit white letters, Intel is drawing 500 watts while gaming confirmed
www.youtube.com
EG1. Just for reference, my 3700x gets 120 fps on Al Mazrah, something has gone terribly wrong here
Here is the video I promised. Didn't test new map but Al Mazrah since it's the worst case scenario. Highlighted CPU power draw with bit white letters, Intel is drawing 500 watts while gaming confirmed
12900k al mazrah
www.youtube.com
EG1. Just for reference, my 3700x gets 120 fps on Al Mazrah, something has gone terribly wrong here
What resolution are you playing?@LtMatt
Here is the video I promised. Didn't test new map but Al Mazrah since it's the worst case scenario. Highlighted CPU power draw with bit white letters, Intel is drawing 500 watts while gaming confirmed
12900k al mazrah
EG1. Just for reference, my 3700x gets 120 fps on Al Mazrah, something has gone terribly wrong here
Associate
@LtMatt m8 i get no way near what your seeing fps wise even at 1080p and with your config. My 7950x3d is stock and my memory at 6000mhz .
Soldato
1080p
This is very strange. My 7950x3d is not anywhere as tuned as Matt but still getting much higher with 4090 also. I doubt that it should be this much difference.
Soldato
Yea, last month a patch came out that borked performance on Intel cpus. AMD sponsored game
Was getting around 250-280 fps before on a stock 12900k..
This is before the "patch"
Last edited:
That is more like it. Hope they fix this. They will probably make it even more worse in the next update though.Yea, last month a patch came out that borked performance on Intel cpus. AMD sponsored game
Was getting around 250-280 fps before on a stock 12900k..
This is before the "patch"
Soldato
Caporegime
It's not AMD sponsored, it features Nvidia tech (Low latency + boost + DLSS) and AMD tech (CAS + FSR 1/2.). It's not sponsored by either company.Yea, last month a patch came out that borked performance on Intel cpus. AMD sponsored game
Was getting around 250-280 fps before on a stock 12900k..
This is before the "patch"
I can tell in that video that you had FSR enabled (or DLSS) without even looking at your settings as there are horrible outlines around the loot boxes and item pickups.
Turn that filth off, whichever tech it is. Using image reconstruction in COD/Warzone is Haram.
Also, that map you are running there (Ashika Island) is different to Al Mazrah and much less demanding on the system. I actually get higher FPS on the new map, Vondel, which has just been added in Season 4, than I did on Ashika Island with the 4090.
That map (Ashika Island) is still available to play. So if you want a true comparison, run that map again and compare.
On my setup, performance has not really changed much on Ashika Island from Season 3.
What memory, FCLK and curve optimiser settings are you running? Are they tuned? If not, you'll get less performance than me.
Last edited:
Soldato
Man I was playing the game a lot, there was no point in no map ever that it dropped to 140 frames as it does now on Al Mazrah. I was always at 250+.It's not AMD sponsored, it features Nvidia tech (Low latency + boost + DLSS) and AMD tech (CAS + FSR 1/2.). It's not sponsored by either company.
I can tell in that video that you had FSR enabled (or DLSS) without even looking at your settings as there are horrible outlines around the loot boxes and item pickups.
Turn that filth off, whichever tech it is. Using image reconstruction in COD/Warzone is Haram.
Also, that map you are running there (Ashika Island) is different to Al Mazrah and much less demanding on the system. I actually get higher FPS on the new map, Vondel, which has just been added in Season 4, than I did on Ashika Island with the 4090.
That map (Ashika Island) is still available to play. So if you want a true comparison, run that map again and compare.
On my setup, performance has not really changed much on Ashika Island from Season 3.
What memory, FCLK and curve optimiser settings are you running? Are they tuned? If not, you'll get less performance than me.
Just look for some warzone 2 videos from 6 months ago
Caporegime
Done and found some. Looked back for 13900K videos from around that time and the 1% lows are in the 120-130 range it seems.
No doubting they are worse now with the updates, but they are worse for me too. Looking back at my performance around that time netted 1% lows of 181, but my average FPS were still 325 at 1440P on Al Mazrah.
Last edited:
Soldato
Just tested Ashika, power draw is up to 70-80w (which is normal in this game, that's what I used to get) but averages are still very low, around 180-190 fps. 1% lows are remarkably high on this one, 155-160.
Anyways, ill try al mazrah on my 6900hs laptop, im pretty confident it will be faster than my 12900k, which is absurd, something has gone terribly wrong there.
Caporegime
Nah, it won't surely. Curious to see your findings though. What CPU is in the laptop?
EDIT - Corrected first video link.
Last edited:
Soldato
6900hs
Don't be so sure, my 3700x desktop got around 110-120 fps, lol
It is megatuned though unlike my laptop
Last edited:
Caporegime
Right, I forgot there's a Ryzen part 6900hs. I thought you meant RDNA2 mobile GPU for a moment.6900hs
Don't be so sure, my 3700x desktop got around 110-120 fps, lol