human teleportation

People have the right to,



You don't need scientific facts or evidence to do so.

A scientific Hypothesis is not a theory or speculation, disagree all you like, but thinking that means that you dont understand the scientific method.

A hypothesis is a proposed explanation for an observable phenomenon.

Human teleportation is not an observable phenomenon.

The theories indicate that it may be possible

Theories are fine and can speculate as much as they like, but that doesnt make any theory hypothesis-able

No theory however indicates that something may or may not be possible. A theory is speculation with no indication to the possibility of its idea.

However, until something is at the least hypothesis-able, then as far as Science is concerned, it is not possible.
 
Last edited:
but teleportation is. Hense a hypothesis for teleporting something bigger

Teleporting a single atom =/= teleporting a whole organism. You cannot go from a quantum level, and immediately apply that as being possible for a full living organism.

Feel free to write that hypothesis if you think it is possible then (for human teleportation), because doing so would make you very very rich.
 
Last edited:
A scientific Hypothesis is not a theory or speculation, disagree all you like, but thinking that means that you dont understand the scientific method.

A hypothesis is a proposed explanation for an observable phenomenon.

Human teleportation is not an observable phenomenon.



Theories are fine and can speculate as much as they like, but that doesnt make any theory hypothesis-able

No theory however indicates that something may or may not be possible. A theory is speculation with no indication to the possibility of its idea.

However, until something is at the least hypothesis-able, then as far as Science is concerned, it is not possible.

Hypothesis:


a proposition, or set of propositions, set forth as an explanation for the occurrence of some specified group of phenomena, either asserted merely as a provisional conjecture to guide investigation (working hypothesis) or accepted as highly probable in the light of established facts.

2.
a proposition assumed as a premise in an argument.
3.
the antecedent of a conditional proposition.
4.
a mere assumption or guess.


:rolleyes:
 
However, until something is at the least hypothesis-able, then as far as Science is concerned, it is not possible.

Yes, correct, as far as science is concerned at the moment, but that still doesn't stop us from (I'll use another word here) 'conjecturing' that it may be possible.

And for your information 'conjecture' is part of a hypothesise,
1. Inference or judgment based on inconclusive or incomplete evidence; guesswork.
 
Teleporting a single atom =/= teleporting a whole organism. You cannot go from a quantum level, and immediatley apply that as being possible for a full living organism.

Feel free to write that hypothesis if you think it is possible then (for human teleportation), because doing so would make you very very rich.

There's a difference between actually going ahead and teleporting something bigger, and taking research gained and hypothesising about teleporting something bigger.

Again, we always start small and work our way to something bigger, If we can move atoms, and things are made of atoms, i hypothesis we can move a mass of atoms, only research is required in order to move those atoms without mixing them up or destroying them
 
Last edited:
Teleporting a single atom =/= teleporting a whole organism. You cannot go from a quantum level, and immediately apply that as being possible for a full living organism.

Feel free to write that hypothesis if you think it is possible then (for human teleportation), because doing so would make you very very rich.

No-one said you could, but given enough time, enough research, enough energy and enough steps in-between it may well be possible.
 
Hypothesis:


a proposition, or set of propositions, set forth as an explanation for the occurrence of some specified group of phenomena, either asserted merely as a provisional conjecture to guide investigation (working hypothesis) or accepted as highly probable in the light of established facts.

2.
a proposition assumed as a premise in an argument.
3.
the antecedent of a conditional proposition.
4.
a mere assumption or guess.


:rolleyes:

'Hypothesis' is different to 'Scientific hypotheseis'.

For a hypothesis to be put forward as a scientific hypothesis, the scientific method requires that one can test it. Scientists generally base scientific hypotheses on previous observations that cannot satisfactorily be explained with the available scientific theories. Even though the words "hypothesis" and "theory" are often used synonymously in common and informal usage, a scientific hypothesis is not the same as a scientific theory. A working hypothesis is a provisionally accepted hypothesis.

Quite amusing really that people dont even understand the basic scientific method. They probably didnt go to school.

No-one said you could, but given enough time, enough research, enough energy and enough steps in-between it may well be possible.

And until then, it remains scientifically impossible.

and taking research gained and hypothesising about teleporting something bigger.

Scientifically speaking, your usage of the word hypothesising' is informal and wrong.
 
Last edited:
^ getting a little bitchy now arent we. Nice going a nice debate turns to saying people never went to school.

Well, when I went to school, we learnt what a scientific hypothesis was, and it definitely is not a theory or speculation.

Though I already did ask anyone to feel free to hypothesize human teleportation, I still dont see it having been done anywhere yet.
 
We're not making a 'scientific hypothesise' (who even said that?) we are making a regular hypotheses, we are not scientists, people make regular hypothesises about possible scientific or technological advances in the future all the time, your taking this too far.
 
'Hypothesis' is different to 'Scientific hypotheseis'.



Quite amusing really that people dont even understand the basic scientific method. They probably didnt go to school.



And until then, it remains scientifically impossible.


Scientific Hypothesis

A hypothesis is an educated guess, based on observation. Usually, a hypothesis can be supported or refuted through experimentation or more observation. A hypothesis can be disproven, but not proven to be true.

Charles H Bennett made his hypothesis based on observations of quantum teleportation and extrapolating those observations from the quantum to the macro world, thus he made an educated guess.

So well within the scientific hypothesis definition boundary.

Maybe you should take your own advice and return to school instead of amusing yourself on fallacies of your own making.;)
 
nevermind, its turned sour now. Fun debates are fun when people just debate rather than attack eachother.

and im glad someone pointed out we're not scientists.:p
 
Last edited:
Charles H Bennett made his hypothesis based on observations of quantum teleportation and extrapolating those observations from the quantum to the macro world, thus he made an educated guess.

That was not a hypothesis, it was an opinion. You just dont know the difference. Regardless, it still doesnt apply to human teleportation.

A hypothesis can be disproven, but not proven to be true.

What crap is this? You can prove a hypothesis to be either true or false through the method.

Wherever you are getting your quotes from is compete rubbish.
 
Last edited:
Well, when I went to school, we learnt what a scientific hypothesis was, and it definitely is not a theory or speculation.


Really, are you sure. This may help.

Words have precise meanings in science. For example, 'theory', 'law', and 'hypothesis' don't all mean the same thing. Outside of science, you might say something is 'just a theory', meaning it's supposition that may or may not be true. In science, a theory is an explanation that generally is accepted to be true. Here's a closer look at these important, commonly misused terms.

Hypothesis

A hypothesis is an educated guess, based on observation. Usually, a hypothesis can be supported or refuted through experimentation or more observation. A hypothesis can be disproven, but not proven to be true.

Example: If you see no difference in the cleaning ability of various laundry detergents, you might hypothesize that cleaning effectiveness is not affected by which detergent you use. You can see this hypothesis can be disproven if a stain is removed by one detergent and not another. On the other hand, you cannot prove the hypothesis. Even if you never see a difference in the cleanliness of your clothes after trying a thousand detergents, there might be one you haven't tried that could be different.

Theory

A scientific theory summarizes a hypothesis or group of hypotheses that have been supported with repeated testing. A theory is valid as long as there is no evidence to dispute it. Therefore, theories can be disproven. Basically, if evidence accumulates to support a hypothesis, then the hypothesis can become accepted as a good explanation of a phenomenon. One definition of a theory is to say it's an accepted hypothesis.

Example: It is known that on June 30, 1908 in Tunguska, Siberia, there was an explosion equivalent to the detonation of about 15 million tons of TNT. Many hypotheses have been proposed for what caused the explosion. It is theorized that the explosion was caused by a natural extraterrestrial phenomenon, and was not caused by man. Is this theory a fact? No. The event is a recorded fact. Is this this theory generally accepted to be true, based on evidence to-date? Yes. Can this theory be shown to be false and be discarded? Yes.

Law

A law generalizes a body of observations. At the time it is made, no exceptions have been found to a law. Scientific laws explain things, but they do not describe them. One way to tell a law and a theory apart is to ask if the description gives you a means to explain 'why'.

Example: Consider Newton's Law of mavity. Newton could use this law to predict the behaviour of a dropped object, but he couldn't explain why it happened.

As you can see, there is no 'proof' or absolute 'truth' in science. The closest we get are facts, which are indisputable observations. Note, however, if you define proof as arriving at a logical conclusion, based on the evidence, then there is 'proof' in science. I work under the definition that to prove something implies it can never be wrong, which is different. If you're asked to define hypothesis, theory, and law, keep in mind the definitions of proof and of these words can vary slightly depending on the scientific discipline. What is important is to realize they don't all mean the same thing and cannot be used interchangeably.
 
That was not a hypothesis, it was an opinion. You just dont know the difference. Regardless, it still doesnt apply to human teleportation.

Only in your opinion.

Either way it is accepted that it may well be possible by those in the relative field.
 
That is not an accurate quote at all, it is written by someone who doesnt know what they are talking about.

A scientific hypothesis CAN be proven to be true, I proved many to be true throughout my A levels and BSc in Human Biology thank you.

In fact, if a scientific hypothesis is proven to be false by a significant magin using statistics, then it becomes rejected. So if a hypothesis can only be disproven, and not proven, then it isnt a true scientific hypothesis in the frst place.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom