- Joined
- 16 May 2004
- Posts
- 6,845
- Location
- Derby
Well according to my wife, the person she handed my resignation letter to (Personnel clerk) was being rather abrupt with her yesterday. Ignoring her, not saying much and when she did it was with a face on and one word answers etc. very out of character. The clerk was fine before wife handed the letter. Later that day the clerk came up to her and hugged my wife and apologised for being a ****. She said she should not have taken it out on my wife.
The only thing we can think off is she was mentioned in my resignation letter. She was interviewed for a statement, not mentioned once in the video or anything like that. The statement was pointless to the investigation as all she said was that she saw it and described a few parts of it. I never once denied I uploaded the video so her statement was irrelevant.
Anyway, apparently the senior management are a bit rattled by the resignation letter as if it went further I was advised to (dependent on out come) file for sex discrimination. I have evidence to back up my claim and my adviser told me the whole investigation was biased and one sided.
When you see the statements from the investigation and other bits of evidence and my letters, which were not used now you would see why. The whole thing from my first meeting was handled very poor.
All my correspondence and what to say and do was under advice from a very successful HR Adviser who has far more experience than the people handling my crock or ****.
When I took redundancy July 2015, 3 normal department managers took the step up to Duty manager. Two of which (one was on nights) handled my disciplinary. The HR manager has only been doing it for 4 years iirc, after being Cafe manager. So very little experience between them and my adviser told me this investigation is basically a case of learning from your mistakes.
My grievance is going ahead still about senior management discussing it in public.
The only thing we can think off is she was mentioned in my resignation letter. She was interviewed for a statement, not mentioned once in the video or anything like that. The statement was pointless to the investigation as all she said was that she saw it and described a few parts of it. I never once denied I uploaded the video so her statement was irrelevant.
Anyway, apparently the senior management are a bit rattled by the resignation letter as if it went further I was advised to (dependent on out come) file for sex discrimination. I have evidence to back up my claim and my adviser told me the whole investigation was biased and one sided.
When you see the statements from the investigation and other bits of evidence and my letters, which were not used now you would see why. The whole thing from my first meeting was handled very poor.
All my correspondence and what to say and do was under advice from a very successful HR Adviser who has far more experience than the people handling my crock or ****.
When I took redundancy July 2015, 3 normal department managers took the step up to Duty manager. Two of which (one was on nights) handled my disciplinary. The HR manager has only been doing it for 4 years iirc, after being Cafe manager. So very little experience between them and my adviser told me this investigation is basically a case of learning from your mistakes.
My grievance is going ahead still about senior management discussing it in public.