I mean...

[james.miller]

You're the one getting publicly bent out of shape over an apostrophe and making it out to be some kind of personal attack, but somehow you think I'm the one looking bad?

Just accept the fact that you made a common mistake and get on with your life.

Or if you fancy a bit of Carry On Karen, report me to the Mods for my blatant, callous, unrelenting and deliberate apostrophism...

I don't care about it, never have cared about such things on a forum because doing so with be ridiculous. My problem with you is you calling me out for it in a different thread. I'm surprised I have to say that so many times for it to sink in. Quit being a knob and get on with your life.

 

[potatolord]

Another one that annoys me: "reach out".

Jeez, it just makes people sound desperate.

 

[ttaskmaster]

I dont care about it , never have cared about such things on a forum because doing so with be ridiculous.

And yet, here you are caring very much about it, like I'd just slapped your kid in the face, or something...!

Are you dilsexic?
Are you uneducated?
Is there any valid reason why you're making this into such a personal thing?

My problem with you is you calling me out for it in a different thread. I'm suprised i have to say that so many times for it to sink in.

I'm not calling YOU specifically out. There are 105 pages of people using the phrase on these forums alone... with and without apostrophes. You're just the one to have used it most recently.

Or, to put it another way - Get over yourself. THIS ISN'T ABOUT YOU!!!!

Quite being a knob and get on with your life.

The word is 'quit'....
And I am getting on with my life. I'm just doing this while waiting for some work files to upload.

 

[Deleted User 298457]

Are you dilsexic?

 

[Graetzbridge]

Go Nesfield!

 

[james.miller]

And yet, here you are caring very much about it, like I'd just slapped your kid in the face, or something...!

Oh are we going to play quote out of context now? Because i highlighted the very sentence I was replying to when i said i didn't care, are you ignoring that or are you just dumb?

Are you dilsexic?

Well ...

The word is 'quit'....

What? That was a typo i corrected as soon as it was posted. Sit on your keyboard waiting to 'warrior much?

 

[Boge]

Anyhoo.

WTF is all that

Aboot?

 

[ttaskmaster]

Oh are we going to play quote out of context now? Because i highlighted the very sentence I was replying to when i said i didn't care, are you ignoring that or are you just dumb?

You quoted my one context and responded with two different premises - Your excessive assertions that you care not for my intentions, and your own separate grievances. Being separate premises, I addressed each one separately, quite clearly opening out the quotes so you could understand this.... but tell me more about how I'm being dumb. That always looks good.

Well ...

Well, what..?
Are you actually dyslexic, or do you just not acknowledge satiric misspelling?

What? That was a typo i corrected as soon as it was posted. Sit on your keyboard waiting to 'warrior much?

Yes, but in a thread where you're getting on your high horse to make things personal, and waving threats if my own spelling isn't perfect, it behooves you not to then dig your hole a little deeper.
And no... I'm sorry, but I'm not actually waiting for you to respond... I had been writing on another thread when I got a notification popping up, telling me someone had responded to one of my posts, so after I was done with that I had a peek. Again, sorry if that upsets you, but I am seeing other people, too.

Jesus, why is it that whenever I'm not deliberately trolling, that's the only time people do get all wound up?

 

[james.miller]

You quoted my one context and responded with two different premises - Your excessive assertions that you care not for my intentions, and your own separate grievances. Being separate premises, I addressed each one separately, quite clearly opening out the quotes so you could understand this.... but tell me more about how I'm being dumb. That always looks good.

Nope, no dual premises from me. One premises, one bolded sentence I replied directly to. You read it wrong. Admit your mistake.

Well, what..?
Are you actually dyslexic, or do you just not acknowledge satiric misspelling?

Satire. Sure.

Yes, but in a thread where you're getting on your high horse to make things personal, and waving threats if my own spelling isn't perfect, it behooves you not to then dig your hole a little deeper.

Lol i'm not on any high horse, I'm only here in this daft thread because YOU took issue with one of my posts. It's you on the high horse pal. Well, 'till you fell off it. and as for threats, don't panic Sally. I needn't get involved because the instant you make a simple mistake will be your own hypocritical undoing.

and no... I'm sorry, but I'm not actually waiting for you to respond... I had been writing on another thread when I got a notification popping up, telling me someone had responded to one of my posts, so after I was done with that I had a peek. Again, sorry if that upsets you, but I am seeing other people, too.

You sure did jump on opening that notification then, because it took me probably less than 30 seconds to correct that typo. The dangers of responding on a phone I guess. But whatever you keep rolling those eyes mate

Jesus, why is it that whenever I'm not deliberately trolling, that's the only time people do get all wound up?

Well if it hasn't sunk in by now I guess it never will ...

 

[Reality|Bites]

If you would just stop replying to it?

 

[ttaskmaster]

Nope, no dual premises from me. One premises, one bolded sentence I replied directly to. You read it wrong. Admit your mistake.

Two premises...
1/. You pretend you don't care about my intent - Which you clearly do as you were here at One in the morning, not only misassuming my intent but also using it for your own agenda.
2/. You object to it being known that you made a mistake - Which is easily resolved by doing what the rest of us do and making the effort to do it the correct way.

Satire. Sure.

Yes, sure.
When you start stalking my posts looking for errors, you'll find I use such rhetorical devices fairly often. Some have even remarked when they appreciated the witticism.

Lol i'm not on any high horse, I'm only here in this daft thread because YOU took issue with one of my posts.

I took issue with the improper use of a phrase.
Again, this has NOTHING TO DO WITH YOU, Karen... If I was going to make it about you, there are dozens of errors I could take a shot at.

If you object this much to simply being wrong, make the effort to do it the right way, like the rest of us.

and as for threats, don't panic Sally. I needn't get involved because the instant you make a simple mistake will be your own hypocritical undoing.

I wasn't panicking, I was looking forward to it... and mildly curious about what you were going to do if ever my post was not perfect.
It won't be anything like my "undoing", though, as I generally just note the mistake and make sure I do better next time - You might even learn from my example!

You sure did jump on opening that notification then, because it took me probably less than 30 seconds to correct that typo. The dangers of responding on a phone I guess. But whatever you keep rolling those eyes mate

Nah. It popped up when I happened to be passing, and the timestamps suggest it took you at least 10 minutes

Well if it hasn't sunk in by now I guess it never will ...

Oh, do tell..... this should be interesting.

If you would just stop replying to it?

But he made all that effort to post, so it'd be rude not to reply...![/QUOTE]

 

[jaybee]

So...

It's all about putting "so..." before everything as well.

 

[RxR]

For some reason parts of the exchange remind me of Thin Lizzy....

"Love hurts, I know...but even so"

 

[james.miller]

Two premises...

Nope, wrong.

Nah. It popped up when I happened to be passing, and the timestamps suggest it took you at least 10 minutes

Nope, wrong. If it took me more than a minute or so to edit that post, the post would have an 'Lasted edited:' suffix at the bottom of it. Do you see one? No. I dont know how much time you have to correct a post before that's added, somebody will be able to confirm but it's a LOT less than 10 minutes.

And the rest of your post...Nope, wrong.

 

[ttaskmaster]

Nope, wrong.

And yet you're still here, doing exactly that.

And the rest of your post...Nope, wrong.

If you say so, Karen.
The sand is over there and I've left you a spade. Best of luck.

 

[james.miller]

Repeating a lie doesn't make you right no matter how many times you shout with your fingers in your ears. I have nothing to hide so if the time it took me to edit a post is such a problem for you as well (come on, that wouldn't surprise anybody at this point), then feel free to ask a mod to confirm exactly when I edited that post since, as you probably are aware, they can see all the edits. Or don't and go play in that sand pit you've just made instead - whatever suits you.

 

[ttaskmaster]

Repeating a lie doesn't make you right no matter how many times you shout with your fingers in your ears. I have nothing to hide so if the time it took me to edit a post is such a problem for you as well (come on, that wouldn't surprise anybody at this point), then feel free to ask a mod to confirm exactly when I edited that post since, as you probably are aware, they can see all the edits. Or don't and go play in that sand pit you've just made instead - whatever suits you.

Problem for me?
You're the one who brought it up... !!

 

[james.miller]

No, I mentioned how you smashed that notification button like a fresh juicy pasty to bitch about a typo I corrected in seconds. You then went on to talk BS about a timestamp suggesting that took me 10 minutes to make that correction. Which timestamp was that, again? Oh oh right. There isnt one. But sure, it's all my problem when you tried to make an example of me (and failed) not once, but twice. Are you really not seeing this? Amazing.

 

[Reality|Bites]

 

[Deleted User 298457]

This is gold