• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

I9 9900k

Distracted said:
I've noticed :mad: I've set the standby at 1v for now like I did previously. I'll adjust the PLL as you suggest. ty

Edit: @moorhen2 do you know what the default values should be and which pll value I should be adjusting in the bios? There is PLL Termination voltage and then in another tab there are several other PLL values :confused:
Click to expand...
I set the CPU Standby voltage to 1.055v, this will default to 1.060v which is the auto default value until you go over 52x multi. You can set this and PLL Termination to 1.1v and forget.
Also have a look in the "tweakers paradise" menu, in there above the "Eventual dram" voltage you will see "PPL Bandwidth", this setting alters the CPU PLL's OC voltage, setting this to Level 0 will give you the "default voltage" of 1.200v for this rail, each level will alter CPU PLL OC voltage, they recommend between Level 6 and 8 for high Ram and CPU frequencies. Hope this helps you.;)
 
moorhen2 said:
I set the CPU Standby voltage to 1.055v, this will default to 1.060v which is the auto default value until you go over 52x multi. You can set this and PLL Termination to 1.1v and forget.
Also have a look in the "tweakers paradise" menu, in there above the "Eventual dram" voltage you will see "PPL Bandwidth", this setting alters the CPU PLL's OC voltage, setting this to Level 0 will give you the "default voltage" of 1.200v for this rail, each level will alter CPU PLL OC voltage, they recommend between Level 6 and 8 for high Ram and CPU frequencies. Hope this helps you.;)
Click to expand...
Thank you, that's very helpful
 
Bluntwrapped said:
Was having a read, apparently Intel are ready to drop a non K 65w 9900 and a 35w 9900T. I’ll be building a SFF HTPC later this year so interested to see how they compare to the 9900k.
Click to expand...

will be very fast... if you can cool it down nicely ! also still better off buying Gigabyte UD Z390 then a B360 board due to VRMs being triple of that found on B360/H370 models .

if small factor, Z390 Aorus ITX or asrock
 
I imagine the low power cpus are 9900k units that can't reach the base speed or boost to be sold as such. Presumably they will be cheaper, but no more efficient than a 9900k downclocked and undervolted.

Efficient and powerful for sure, but standard fare low power offerings. If the price isn't decent then there will probably be something ryzen that does the same for less.
 
moorhen2 said:
Temps seem excessive for that load voltage, what are you cooling with ?
RB not showing any temps ?
Click to expand...

For some reason Realbench stopped showing temps after a Windows update. I might do a clean windows installation this weekend. Hope it fixes it. I'm using a Corsair H150i 360mm and temps are similar to the Kraken X62 280mm I was using before. Honestly, I'm not impressed with the Corsair, I'll probably delid the CPU and go custom loop.
 
AStaley said:
Are you referring to the "refresh", https://www.anandtech.com/show/1425...all-the-desktop-and-mobile-45w-cpus-announced?
Click to expand...

Yep I am. Reluctant to call it a refresh though!

orbitalwalsh said:
will be very fast... if you can cool it down nicely ! also still better off buying Gigabyte UD Z390 then a B360 board due to VRMs being triple of that found on B360/H370 models .

if small factor, Z390 Aorus ITX or asrock
Click to expand...

Is the ASUS Z390 in with a shout?

Distracted said:
I imagine the low power cpus are 9900k units that can't reach the base speed or boost to be sold as such. Presumably they will be cheaper, but no more efficient than a 9900k downclocked and undervolted.

Efficient and powerful for sure, but standard fare low power offerings. If the price isn't decent then there will probably be something ryzen that does the same for less.
Click to expand...

I was wondering the same. Maybe the new KF - non igpu will undervolt and downlock quite nicely. I’ll be using the Dr Zaber Sentry 2.0 when I get it so I’ll save until then and buy something once I’ve seen Ryzen. It’ll be either a low powered CPU with low profile cooler and full length GPU, or higher power CPU with AIO cooler and ITX size GPU.
 
https://www.overclock.net/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=250662&d=1548963030

Aorus is 6 phase design , less amps then asrock which is 60amps over 5 units but thermally better - also UK RMA and support unlike asrock and asus

My basket at Overclockers UK:
Total: £576.07 (includes shipping: £11.10)


asrock do make a good middle ground that would be okay for non overclocked 9900t

https://www.overclockers.co.uk/asro...1151-ddr4-mini-itx-motherboard-mb-16l-ak.html​
 
moorhen2 said:
I set the CPU Standby voltage to 1.055v, this will default to 1.060v which is the auto default value until you go over 52x multi. You can set this and PLL Termination to 1.1v and forget.
Also have a look in the "tweakers paradise" menu, in there above the "Eventual dram" voltage you will see "PPL Bandwidth", this setting alters the CPU PLL's OC voltage, setting this to Level 0 will give you the "default voltage" of 1.200v for this rail, each level will alter CPU PLL OC voltage, they recommend between Level 6 and 8 for high Ram and CPU frequencies. Hope this helps you.;)
Click to expand...
Late reply I know but I've only just fixed these voltages. I set everything PLL in tweakers paradise to the default value (0.9 on most but not all according to the bios help text) and set the bandwidth to 0.
No problems so far.

Thanks again.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom