IMPORTANT: Members Market access

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bumping a one year old thread with an irrelevant single word answer isn't a good start btw.... Just sayin' ;)
What are you even talking about? Don't be unreasonably trying to make me look like a fool Feek. I'll risk getting banned before taking that kind of punking lying down.

EDIT: do you mean when I replied "...extinguish" to the post about the SystemD guy moving to Microsoft? If so, I didn't even notice the age of that thread, and that comment is perfect in the form of a singular word. Don't start with me. I'm not the one.
 
Last edited:
I'm not a hard man, but I'm not about to take disrespect quietly. Talking about resurrecting threads. I'm ready to start typing battle raps like it's 2008 in here.
It is almost as if you are behaving like you haven't been a regular contributor to a forum for a decade plus.
 
Last edited:
EDIT: do you mean when I replied "...extinguish" to the post about the SystemD guy moving to Microsoft? If so, I didn't even notice the age of that thread, and that comment is perfect in the form of a singular word. Don't start with me. I'm not the one.
It was a totally irrelevant response to a thread that was over a year old.

I'm not a hard man, but I'm not about to take disrespect quietly. Talking about resurrecting threads. I'm ready to start typing battle raps like it's 2008 in here.
You bumped a year old thread with a single word and I pointed that out.

If you want to talk about disrespect, let's look back at the first post in this thread which specifically mentions 'making meaningful posts'.

/edit - I noticed earlier that you've increased your contributions in the forums over the last couple of days and that's fantastic. That's exactly what we want. But irrelevant single word bumps to old threads simply don't come under meaningful posts which is why I pointed it out.
 
Posted a fair bit more since this thread, be interested to know what my post count would be if it hadn't been stopped :).
 
Is it not possible to take into account members who have high trust feedback too?
It seems a bit unfair to remove for those who have dozens of solid items or purchases over the years.
 
Is it not possible to take into account members who have high trust feedback too?
It seems a bit unfair to remove for those who have dozens of solid items or purchases over the years.

Hi, welcome to the rest of the forum. I'm sure you'll be a valued contributor towards various discussions and follow some of our exciting topics. I for one am very excited to hear your opinion on the Elon Musk / Twitter story.
 
Is it not possible to take into account members who have high trust feedback too?
It seems a bit unfair to remove for those who have dozens of solid items or purchases over the years.
Imo your "reputation" and general interaction across the forum is part of the access requirements. If you aren't active then how can people see that you will be around to handle any transactions/problems. Equally if you aren't "invested" in the forum then losing access isn't really a deterrent for bad MM behaviour
 
Imo your "reputation" and general interaction across the forum is part of the access requirements. If you aren't active then how can people see that you will be around to handle any transactions/problems. Equally if you aren't "invested" in the forum then losing access isn't really a deterrent for bad MM behaviour
I guess that comes down to interpretation of the term 'active'.
Just because a user doesn't post often doesn't necessarily mean that they don't regularly access the forum and browse..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom