In Reponse To Member Demand - A New Avatar

Status
Not open for further replies.
Otacon said:
Dont think I've got there though :/

No it went straight over my head mate. No suprise there then a.
You all take it that i am getting worked up when i am merely stating what i think on a keyboard.
Trust me, when i get worked up i do Not sit down.

I won't bother answering the kissers post as he is just Not worthy.
 
Yewen said:
Where do people find these smileys for every situation?

Please let me in on the hidden smiley circle!

In you get..

toiletclaw.gif
 
Yewen said:
malc30 I am sure there is an ongoing debate behind the scences on what to do regards this, Otacon does not need defending as I am quite sure he knew how this thread would go.
Last i heard new avatars were not on the agenda and were never going to be. If they are great.
Otacon gives the impression he didn't realise this thread would go this way. If it was meant to be a joke then fair enough but i'm not the only one who doesn't see it that way. It looks to me like a deliberate attempt to antagonise some members. I'm hoping it wasn't deliberate.
 
ElRazur said:
Translation

I made a thread, a pretty bad one. Not the type El/Meg/Stig will even make (we are labelled spammers right?)
It didnt go down well, i try to silent people by abusing my powers but people saw that trick, so i went away and turned up 2-3pages later to give a defence of what ive done hoping they will buy it!


My reaction
There is no justification, this is double standards period.

get a grip, ITS FUNNY!!! he started a thread abouthis amusing avatar, I for one like think its cool! its not double stadards as the dons do a lot of work monitoring the forums and keeping this one "family safe", and close trolling threads like you in this one, they have more powers in orders to do this...... and make us laugh with amusing avatars. A nice genuine funny thread!
 
dirtydog said:
Don't ask, people were suspended / banned last time...

Well I'll be damned for not being in the thread in question at the time, but since this thread has gone way down the drain (hell even the OP said it :D), I may as well ask a quick question before it disappears :)
 
Joe42 said:
Last i heard new avatars were not on the agenda and were never going to be. If they are great.
Otacon gives the impression he didn't realise this thread would go this way. If it was meant to be a joke then fair enough but i'm not the only one who doesn't see it that way. It looks to me like a deliberate attempt to antagonise some members. I'm hoping it wasn't deliberate.

Its something that is always cropping up, and has probably been done to death, but it will always be a topic for discussion on the boards, as would people with a picture with 10 lines of text in it.

I took this totally as a joke, what it was. Tripe for GD.

ElRazur, Megzy does not spam, never has she is just the victim of thread trashing due to a couple of poorly worded threads.

Mr Kebab, get on msn. :)
 
Yewen said:
Its something that is always cropping up, and has probably been done to death, but it will always be a topic for discussion on the boards, as would people with a picture with 10 lines of text in it.

I took this totally as a joke, what it was. Tripe for GD.

ElRazur, Megzy does not spam, never has she is just the victim of thread trashing due to a couple of poorly worded threads.
Stig on the otherhand......
 
Killerkebab said:
Well I'll be damned for not being in the thread in question at the time, but since this thread has gone way down the drain (hell even the OP said it :D), I may as well ask a quick question before it disappears :)

The basic answer to your question is, that's how Spie wants it :) I don't want to see anyone else banned over it, I remember Gadget being banned and I was suspended.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom