shadowscotland said:
Not my fault some people have to use wierd uncommon cpus.
Maybe i'll enter an old ibm cpu i have just to annoy you.
Edit: Is it just my brain turning to jelly trying to work out equivalent ghz ratings and then overclocked equivalent ghz ratings...?
A core 2 E6600 = 8.8eqghz (equivalent ghz, or p4 ghz if you like, which has kind of become a performance measurement)
Following through my guide (which is horribly complicated, dubiously accurate, and needs to be revised).
If that was clocked up to 3ghz, add 400 = 3.4ghz. A 4000+ is 2.4.
4200 2.6
4400 2.8
4600 3.0
4800 3.2
5000 3.4
5000 x2 = 10,000 = 10eqghz
So an e6600 overclocked to 3ghz is 10eqghz. i.e its equivalent to two p4s at 5ghz.
So it does eventually spit out a somewhat believable number this guide. I just need to revise the method of getting there. Not that you need to work out the eqghz for its overclocked speed, i've just noticed. Will leave that there as an example. And a 2nd eqghz figure to work with.
Lets assume it does 500ppd when overclocked, 500/8.8eqghz = 56.8
Now lets assume we have a core 2 duo with a stock speed of 3ghz, and its overclocked above that.
Lets assume it does 700ppd when overclocked, 700/10eqghz = 70
So the 2nd cpu would win in the most extra points achieved through overclocking category. Whatever that proves.
Raise your hand if you think i've gone completely and utterly mad...? *surveys forest of raised hands*