Permabanned
- Joined
- 28 Sep 2018
- Posts
- 0
TSMC details node specifications so you can google them and learn how they apply.
Here's intel 14nm for reference.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Intel 10th Gen Comet Lake thread
- Thread starter AthlonXP1800
- Start date
TSMC details node specifications so you can google them and learn how they apply.
Here's intel 14nm for reference.
would be much higher than that surely
if intel is managing 12 threads at 5.5ghz with just 190w then that's incredible binning
Normally 12 thread intel CPUs pull 150w to 170w at just 5.0ghz, going to 5.5ghz has been unthinkable without LN2 before
Where is the source for that image? The image itself has a very low dpi count, could easily Just be a photoshop
Last edited:
Its clocked to the moon, its what Intel do these days, refresh the same crap but higher clocked, they have been doing that for so long the power consumption has now got insane.
My 3600 runs at 65c in a test like that under a £45 AIO, the fan barely even knows something is happening, its spinning so slow i can almost watch the blades go round, Silence.
Associate
- Joined
- 6 Oct 2019
- Posts
- 585
Well a quick calculation on the reported Amps and V = 208Watts - To me a Consumer grade CPU an i5 pulling 208Watts is bad? How can HP and the like make a system and have it achieve those speeds? It will be crippled with the stock Intel cooler would it not?
Madness, I used the stock Ryzen cooler and it was silent and never went above 68c Have an AIO now and like yours the fans are at max 600RPM its silent.
Associate
- Joined
- 6 Oct 2019
- Posts
- 585
Saying that the Turbo on the i5 listed is 4.5Ghz according to a quick Google but the image I quoted is 5.5Ghz didn't see that. so its running an +1GHz overclock?
It's clearly overclocked though. Probably under water. You can also see the memory is overclocked.
Associate
- Joined
- 6 Oct 2019
- Posts
- 585
I did not see the 5.5 going blind in my old age! I am not sure now tbh what to think. I was going on it being a stock i5
150 AMPS X 1.33v = 199 Watts, i don't know if that includes the Un-Core rail.
4.8Ghz Turbo for the 10600K, it is overclocked, the stress test was only running just over a minute and a half, the VRM's readout looks suspect at 42c, could just be a misread.
Intel’s 65W Core i9-10900F 10 Core Desktop CPU Consumes 224W Power at Max Load, Over 90C Temperatures With a 240mm Radiator
https://wccftech.com/intel-core-i9-10900f-10-core-comet-lake-desktop-cpu-65w-tdp-224w-power-consumption/
https://wccftech.com/intel-core-i9-10900f-10-core-comet-lake-desktop-cpu-65w-tdp-224w-power-consumption/
Soldato
- Joined
- 31 May 2009
- Posts
- 21,457
I dislike wtf tech, but even so, that is utterly awful for a 65watt component, any laptop built on these chips is going to last 5 minutes on battery.
65 Watt CPU....... "Hey everyone, AMD's 3900X is a 105 Watt CPU, but our 10 core is only a 65 Watt CPU, see? we are better, we win"
This sort of blatant lying crap needs looking at by people who regulate what companies claim their products are.
This sort of blatant lying crap needs looking at by people who regulate what companies claim their products are.
Yes, just get yourself a servant to pour LN2 while you use it.
motherboard vrm? Depends on the board - my overclocked 3950x pulls 250w at full load and if I run a 1 minute stress test the vrm on this x570 formula sits at 33c
I still think it's photoshopped. It doesn't make any logical sense unless somehow it's now built on 10nm and they fixed 10nm.
the image itself is very grainy and full of artifacts, a common trick when someone has been editing the images to try and hide their work.
Just a few posts up there is a more legit looking stock 10 core intel cpu drawing 225w at all core 4.5ghz. And they want me to belive a 6 core pulls 190w at all core 5.5ghz.... don't make me laugh - my 5ghz 8700k 6 core cpu pulled 170w and this new intel cpu is still just 14nm.. going from 5ghz @ 170w to 5.5ghz @ 190w on the same process node seems impossible to me
10 core flagship i9 will no doubt extend the gaming performance lead that the 9900k has over the competition.
Pretty insane how a 5 year old architecture and process is still ahead in gaming over AMDs brand new Zen2 and much newer 7nm process.
Intel CPU's use more power sure, but for gaming performance and topping the graphs is key. Also 90% of the 10 core flagship owners will never run their CPU flat out 100% load, games are still low threaded and prefer bursty workloads, which the 10 core clocked to the moon will excel at.
Pretty insane how a 5 year old architecture and process is still ahead in gaming over AMDs brand new Zen2 and much newer 7nm process.
Intel CPU's use more power sure, but for gaming performance and topping the graphs is key. Also 90% of the 10 core flagship owners will never run their CPU flat out 100% load, games are still low threaded and prefer bursty workloads, which the 10 core clocked to the moon will excel at.
Yes, but that lead is shrinking every year and right now it's very tight. The 10 core won't keep its lead for very long - these CPUs were supposed to be out months ago and are already delayed - now they are supposedly launching on 30 April - giving just a few months before that lead you mentioned is wiped out by Zen 3 - after that AMD will have the lead - that's the scary part because it's 5 year old tech needs a replacement and it's replacement is MIA with Intel's own employees lining up by the truckload to say how crap Intel's tech is now and how it's getting worse each year.
You have Intel bluecard employees saying the company is becoming like Apple, everything they do is hype and marketing with little to backup the **** talk.
Last edited:
This is why 3 years ago i never believed "Intel would just pull a super CPU out of their back sides to combat Ryzen.... because Intel super and can just crush AMD at will"
Intel have got too big and too comfortable for too long, they don't know how to make good stuff any more and they certainly don't know how to take on someone who does, all they do now, much like Apple, is use their brand recognition to bluff and blag or outright fill people full of crap!
Intel have got too big and too comfortable for too long, they don't know how to make good stuff any more and they certainly don't know how to take on someone who does, all they do now, much like Apple, is use their brand recognition to bluff and blag or outright fill people full of crap!