Probably I will get the 1700, the idea is to OC it and get the 1800X performance, which is also seen in the graph. The 933 seconds result.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Intel admits it won't catch up with AMD's 7nm chips until 2021
- Thread starter Phil Smith
- Start date
Probably I will get the 1700, the idea is to OC it and get the 1800X performance, which is also seen in the graph. The 933 seconds result.
In some apps, there is a little more difference, but in gaming it's maximum 10% which doesn't justify the 2.5X price increase!
There is no difference between 3700X and 2700X in many apps, or the difference is so negligible that it isn't worth it to be discussed.
https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/amd_ryzen_7_3700x_ryzen_9_3900x_review,18.html
That's not entirely accurate now is it, if we take your chart as indicative then the 8 core 2700X is faster than the 10 core 7900X, we all know its not, you've picked an outlier with very odd performance scalling.
This is reality.
And 12% higher IPC
In some apps, there is a little more difference, but in gaming it's maximum 10% which doesn't justify the 2.5X price increase!
There is no difference between 3700X and 2700X in many apps, or the difference is so negligible that it isn't worth it to be discussed.
https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/amd_ryzen_7_3700x_ryzen_9_3900x_review,18.html
So you don't get virtually the same performance do you. The performance gap is actually virtually huge.
Last edited:
If 3% is huge for you...... lol
The performance difference between the 1700 and 3700X is 48%, not 3%.
No, it is not.
1800X (which can be easily achieved by OCing the 1700) does give 80% of the performance of 3700X while being 40% of its price https://www.techpowerup.com/review/amd-ryzen-7-3700x/22.html
This is how I make decisions. Not based on CB because it is a synthetic benchmark that I don't take into consideration.
Please tell me that 3% is typo and you meant 30% although that is incredibly generous.
Permabanned
- Joined
- 11 Jan 2019
- Posts
- 3,214
- Location
- bedlam
In the Relative Performance chart at tpu, the difference is 37.93%, in the 4K Gaming chart, which is what I care about, the difference is 0.9%..
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/amd-ryzen-7-3700x/22.html
In the Relative Performance chart at tpu, the difference is 37.93%, in the 4K Gaming chart, which is what I care about, the difference is 0.9%..
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/amd-ryzen-7-3700x/22.html
Really that is what you base your *argument on? You know what you’ve said isn’t based in reality?
i3 8350k is 1% away from topping that chart... If that’s all you care about why not make the same argument for the i3?
In the Relative Performance chart at tpu, the difference is 37.93%, in the 4K Gaming chart, which is what I care about, the difference is 0.9%..
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/amd-ryzen-7-3700x/22.html
?????????????
So you look at a GPU bottleneck and you think it's a good CPU comparison to look at a row of CPUs doing virtually identical performance because they're waiting for the overloaded GPU.
You don't need a super CPU to keep up with a choked GPU at 4k, as the chart shows, basically anything will do.
The difference between 2700X and 3700X is 3% in the aforementioned Vegas rendering task.
I assume that by OCing the 1700, one would get very close performance to both.
In the Relative Performance chart at tpu, the difference is 37.93%, in the 4K Gaming chart, which is what I care about, the difference is 0.9%..
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/amd-ryzen-7-3700x/22.html
This ^^^^ by your measure a Ryzen 1400 is 95% that of a 9900K.
Why is the 9900K so expensive?!?!?!?! rarw rarw rarw#~*&$%"£
Your assumptions are fundamentally wrong.
The 3700X is 19% ahead of a 1800X. You compared the 1700 to the 3700X trying to imply they offered similar performance. This simply isn’t fact or based on reality.
Last edited:
Because intel has 85% market share and doesn't care
Is this why you focus all your rage at AMD?
The 1700 is £200 because its end of life stock.
It was $330 Launch. (8c 16t)
The 1700X $400 Launch (8c 16t)
The 1800X $500 Launch (8c 16t)
3700X $330 (8c 16t)
3800X $400 (8c 16t)
3900X $500 (12c 24t)
My Ryzen 1600 was $190 Launch
The 3600 is $190, its 30% faster in games, if i drop the resolution so low its purely academic, i have gained very little at 1080P, nothing at 1440P but i knew that before i bought it, it will run a faster GPU much better when i get one.
It was $330 Launch. (8c 16t)
The 1700X $400 Launch (8c 16t)
The 1800X $500 Launch (8c 16t)
3700X $330 (8c 16t)
3800X $400 (8c 16t)
3900X $500 (12c 24t)
My Ryzen 1600 was $190 Launch
The 3600 is $190, its 30% faster in games, if i drop the resolution so low its purely academic, i have gained very little at 1080P, nothing at 1440P but i knew that before i bought it, it will run a faster GPU much better when i get one.
Why are my assumptions wrong and not based on reality when they are true?
Ryzen 7 1700 I can BUY for 134 quid. Ryzen 7 3700X is 330 quid and gives ~20% more speed.
https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/amd_ryzen_7_1700_review,24.html
Why are my assumptions wrong and not based on reality when they are true?
Ryzen 7 1700 I can BUY for 134 quid. Ryzen 7 3700X is 330 quid and gives ~20% more speed.
https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/amd_ryzen_7_1700_review,24.html
Because you are talking cobblers?
Why are my assumptions wrong and not based on reality when they are true?
Ryzen 7 1700 I can BUY for 134 quid. Ryzen 7 3700X is 330 quid and gives ~20% more speed.
https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/amd_ryzen_7_1700_review,24.html
Same as i said earlier....
That's not entirely accurate now is it, if we take your chart as indicative then the 8 core 2700X is faster than the 10 core 7900X, we all know its not, you've picked an outlier with very odd performance scalling.
This is reality.
And 12% higher IPC
1700 vs 3700X +48%