That campaign theoretically has more customers than the entire product potential.
I couldn't possibly comment.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
That campaign theoretically has more customers than the entire product potential.
I know there is a lot of negativity in this thread but I think ARC for a first attempt coming into a market where the 2 competitors have had a 20 year head start is quite impressive.
Drivers etc take time and have to be built up as there is so many games on the market that need work in optimising and both competitors already have this work done so they only need to focus on new releases.
RT seems to be on par with ampere which is impressive for a first attempt considering RDNA1 didn't even have RT and also suffered with driver issues.
XESS is also available at launch compared to FSR which users had to wait around 8 months for with RDNA2.
This is why we only had 2 competitors in the GPU market for years as starting from scratch in designing and building a GPU costs a huge amount of cash and then the software side needs investment also.Things look quite grim for the Arc - all the reviews are negative, cost of materials is probably higher than an RTX 3070 (TSMC 6N crystal, 256 bit memory), but the performance is similar to an RTX 2060.
Intel will need to absorb a ton of losses in this and the next generation before they have a somewhat competitive, somewhat profitable product in the 3rd generation.
Think they may refocus Arc as AI/ML/neural network compute processor and abandon the consumer/gaming market.
This is why we only had 2 competitors in the GPU market for years as starting from scratch in designing and building a GPU costs a huge amount of cash and then the software side needs investment also.
Things look quite grim for the Arc - all the reviews are negative, cost of materials is probably higher than an RTX 3070 (TSMC 6N crystal, 256 bit memory), but the performance is similar to an RTX 2060.
Hold on … lets get a bit real here. To take that card apart was pulling off a piece held on by some tape … and some screws. If you consider that hard … really? Come on.
Once Steve figured out the order of undoing bits, the cables and pcb bits all came apart from each other without too much fuss. The cables all pulled out between the holes in the parts easily. What made it a mess was Steve didn’t know the order of it. I bet you’d manage fine after doing a second card.
The reality is that the card can be dismantled and parts replaced … so if something goes on it, it can be fixed. If that means a few more screws than average , boohoo … get a grip. The faux outrage over things like this is a joke.
But for the vast vast vast majority of people who will (maybe) buy this card, they will be more bothered about whether it is performant or not … the disassembly of a card such as this is just such a non-issue for the majority of buyers And I don’t think it should be made out to be the big issue it seems to be portrayed as.It's built like a cheap toy is the problem, the tape on the backplate means you need new tape and then the chance of bending the flimsy thin backplate removing it and then it's warped when trying to stick it back. Steve states as others noticed it is one of the worst cards to dismantle and put back together. Anyone with some skill in taking items apart can do it but the point is it's a hassle to do and could have easily been designed better.
I see the whole situation through a different lens.
Imagine, you're buying a car. You come across a brand that offers the same features as some other car you like but at 1/3 the cost.
The only downside is, some of the main features are locked behind a software update you'll get in 6-12 months for free.
Do you buy the other car? Or do you buy the one 1/3 the cost? Do you need the features right now?
That's where I am. Coming from 1070 I'm assured an upgrade, and then with time it'll only get better (benchies show it has the horsepower)
I see the whole situation through a different lens.
Imagine, you're buying a car. You come across a brand that offers the same features as some other car you like but at 1/3 the cost.
The only downside is, some of the main features are locked behind a software update you'll get in 6-12 months for free.
Do you buy the other car? Or do you buy the one 1/3 the cost? Do you need the features right now?
That's where I am. Coming from 1070 I'm assured an upgrade, and then with time it'll only get better (benchies show it has the horsepower)
Cause the performance won't improve. The performance per dollar in months will be better or nearer a 3070 I reckon.Why not just buy this? Its faster and costs the same, and it just works.
Sapphire Radeon RX 6650 XT Pulse Gaming OC 8GB GDDR6 PCI-Express Graphics Card
Order Sapphire Radeon RX 6650 XT Pulse Gaming OC 8GB GDDR6 PCI-Express Graphics Card now online and benefit from fast delivery.www.overclockers.co.uk
Cause the performance won't improve. The performance per dollar in months will be better or nearer a 3070 I reckon.
With respect i think you're deluded if you think that.
I'll take it!
Sorry need to get some tissues to contain my drool.
I'll take it!
Sorry need to get some tissues to contain my drool.
I'd rather back a new player. I like underdogs.