• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285k 'Arrow Lake' Discussion/News ("15th gen") on LGA-1851

Team on loosing side? I don’t care what cpu I get. As long as the gains are good :) and yes I play nothing but 4k with super marginal differences . Would be nice to see a few 4k tests . Not everyone on the forum is a fanboy :)

AL is a flop the platform looks dead before it's even started
if your building a system now from scratch, there is a clear choice which one to buy and if you need productivity 9950x3d yet to arrive on a better platform

I like to keep CPU much longer than doing GPU upgrades and with that GPU bottleneck reduces

Even if I don't play at 1080p and the price is similar why would I buy the slower one ?

But if coming from previous generations probably not worth it especially if you play at 4K
 
Last edited:
Team on loosing side? I don’t care what cpu I get. As long as the gains are good :) and yes I play nothing but 4k with super marginal differences . Would be nice to see a few 4k tests . Not everyone on the forum is a fanboy :)
lmao its got nothing to do with Fanboyism - you sound like a fan boy defending intel. Buy the best ( This generation ) but AMD Intel is dead already ( this generation )....
 
Last edited:
defending intel? mine was a general statement saying that all reviews should have 1080p, 1440p and 4k. as they are the most used. You seem very defensive.........now i see the fanboys
 
If you click through there is a hidden 14900K result with appropriate RAM - out performs the 9800X3D. I don't think AL even with better RAM would make up the difference.

Its also overclocked, tuned ram and overclocked CPU, and looks like hyperthreading is disabled as well
 
Last edited:
Its also overclocked, tuned ram and overclocked CPU, and looks like hyperthreading is disabled as well

An interesting result with a ~18% performance uplift from the stock CPU with 5600MHz RAM none the less - I can't see the AL chips making up that difference even with CUDIMMs.
 
The 14900K has always been good with pushing 400 watts in to it and getting quite a boost from it, the trouble is this is because its running with all safe limits removed to do it and that's very bad for its long term health.
 
I'll add to that i find it quite weird that none of these youtubers ever questioned these power levels and voltages, people like JayZ2Cents making overclocking tutorials on them pumping over 1.6v in torture tests as if that was never going to be a problem, its like they collectively forgot what was common sense for anyone whose spent more than 6 weeks being an enthusiast in this space, even motherboard vendors themselves pushing very unhealthy voltages in to the CPU out of the box, they did the same with the 7800X3D pumping as much as 1.7v in to the SoC when AMD's white paper clearly states 1.3v absolute maximum for 24/7 use and preferably no more than 1.2v, 1.5/6/7v is absolutely insane, those are the sort of volts you pump it with if you're deliberately trying to fry it.

How is it that i can know that, how is it that i get nervous setting voltages that aren't yet close to 1.3v on my 5800X SoC and they ram 1.6v down its throat like this is fine?

Honestly i don't get it...

Oh and my 50800X has now passed 4 years old, its perfect despite the hard life its had rendering and baking in Unreal Engine, you think compiling Shaders in Unreal Engine is hard on the CPU try baking thousands of points of light in parallel with Unreal Engine over 6 hours straight. It is not a mirrical that a CPU can do that for 4 years and still be perfectly healthy, like new. CPU's are designed to be that durable, or at least they used to be.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom