Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
when your own shareholders want to sue you. things getting worse.
The shareholders should have stepped in around 2015. A court case now achieves nothing.
I’ve tested all the 13th and 14th gen CPU’s I own (3) and none of them display excessive voltage. My 14900k NEVER exceeds 1.38v as far as my testing has shown.Afaik the overvolting microcode bug is not connected to power draw, Intel have said that any 13th-14th CPUs are potentially affected, even CPUs that rarely exceed 65 watts (like the 13400) and don't have TVB (Intel denied the initial reports that the bug was limited to TVB and only the 13900/14900 CPUs have it). My understanding is that they can be given excessive (degrading) voltage even at idle.
The microcode might have been looked into before I post this, so it might not be true now, but at the time of my post, we didn't know how, why or in what circumstances the degradation/overvolting occurs, that's part of the problem of Intel not giving the specifics.I’ve tested all the 13th and 14th gen CPU’s I own (3) and none of them display excessive voltage. My 14900k NEVER exceeds 1.38v as far as my testing has shown.
If you have a boxed CPU that they're happy to accept the RMA from, then the 5 year warranty will give some sense of security, for sure, but it isn't that simple for everyone who owns one (e.g. tray warranties are normally only one year) and you rely on Intel (or whoever built your PC) honouring the RMA.If they degrade I will RMA them, simple.
Tray CPUs definitely a bit of a, pain, but with Intel extending the warranty by two extra years on tray cpus it is good news, but not much good for anyone that buys a, tray cpu 2nd user, I have two retail i9 13900k cpus, both bought 2nd user, one was returned last week under the Intel warranty, Intel where swift and I had a brand new boxed i9 13900k in return.... IMHO I think the Intel panic could make for some excellent 2nd user bargains, coupled with Intels excellent warranty, due to Intel warranty been on the CPU for the original purchaser and any 2nd user buyer, with no need to provide any copies of original purchase receipts.The microcode might have been looked into before I post this, so it might not be true now, but at the time of my post, we didn't know how, why or in what circumstances the degradation/overvolting occurs, that's part of the problem of Intel not giving the specifics.
If they did explain it in detail, there would be a lot less speculation.
If you have a boxed CPU that they're happy to accept the RMA from, then the 5 year warranty will give some sense of security, for sure, but it isn't that simple for everyone who owns one (e.g. tray warranties are normally only one year) and you rely on Intel (or whoever built your PC) honouring the RMA.
Its a pretty poor situation at the moment - everyone is hoping that Intel will get there act together and actually do an Asus and apologise and make it easy for people with this issue - There is pressure on them to do it, and I hope people start voting with their money as most of these big companies only care when things start effecting their bottom line. The only thing you can do at the moment is what Intel have said which is pretty poor - "Keep sending it back untill you get a customer service person that accepts the RMA" it is terrible customer service but its what Intel have been telling most Tech influencers and posting in their information... if it were me I would be waiting untill they have some better RMA procedures in place or maybe give it a go once now and see how it goes... gutted for you mateI'm going to ask to be spoonfed a little here, because trying to find concrete information on this is a bleedin' nightmare. I have a 13700k bought pretty much a year ago, so probably within the "potentially affected" batches, but what *exactly* does "my chip is humped" look like in practice? Is it *only* full system crashes I have to worry about, or is stuff like games randomly CTDing and windows cacking itself when I try to take a screenshot also a possible indicator? And if it is, how do I tell apart "my chip is humped" from everyday "it's Current Year, all software is buggy garbage and all customers are permanent beta testers" instability? Is there a specific, verifiable test I can run that will tell me one way or the other? Ideally something OCUK will accept as actual proof, because I really don't fancy doing the RMA Shuffle with them again as I did with my last CPU where I send it in and they insist it works fine on their test bench and send it back only for it to still fail to boot, rinse and repeat.
I'm going to ask to be spoonfed a little here, because trying to find concrete information on this is a bleedin' nightmare. I have a 13700k bought pretty much a year ago, so probably within the "potentially affected" batches, but what *exactly* does "my chip is humped" look like in practice? Is it *only* full system crashes I have to worry about, or is stuff like games randomly CTDing and windows cacking itself when I try to take a screenshot also a possible indicator? And if it is, how do I tell apart "my chip is humped" from everyday "it's Current Year, all software is buggy garbage and all customers are permanent beta testers" instability? Is there a specific, verifiable test I can run that will tell me one way or the other? Ideally something OCUK will accept as actual proof, because I really don't fancy doing the RMA Shuffle with them again as I did with my last CPU where I send it in and they insist it works fine on their test bench and send it back only for it to still fail to boot, rinse and repeat.
As others have said, it's tricky because there is no one clear pathway of symptoms. That said, full system crashes seem to be one of the late symptoms. A friend with a 13900K he's pretty sure affected reckons the first problem he noticed were random pauses of a few seconds when opening certain programs. Then he got an increase in crash-to-desktops in-game. Unreal Engine games, particularly UE5 titles, seem particularly prone to triggering these. For him, the point he realised something was seriously wrong was when Lords of the Fallen (a UE5 game) started refusing to load, having previously run ok, with an "out of memory" error.I'm going to ask to be spoonfed a little here, because trying to find concrete information on this is a bleedin' nightmare. I have a 13700k bought pretty much a year ago, so probably within the "potentially affected" batches, but what *exactly* does "my chip is humped" look like in practice? Is it *only* full system crashes I have to worry about, or is stuff like games randomly CTDing and windows cacking itself when I try to take a screenshot also a possible indicator? And if it is, how do I tell apart "my chip is humped" from everyday "it's Current Year, all software is buggy garbage and all customers are permanent beta testers" instability? Is there a specific, verifiable test I can run that will tell me one way or the other? Ideally something OCUK will accept as actual proof, because I really don't fancy doing the RMA Shuffle with them again as I did with my last CPU where I send it in and they insist it works fine on their test bench and send it back only for it to still fail to boot, rinse and repeat.
They'll be reluctant to do this. It's more likely to come from a third party.Hope intel brings out a program that we can run, to see if our cpu's have been damaged or degraded already before this bios release.