Where does the £50 pentium k keep up with the fx8350 in gaming precisely? In a few games in which it would keep up with a 4770k also? I see two benchies with a 8350 and the £50 chip in, and the stock 8350, stock and overclocked fx6300(£90) and the stock and overclocked FX4300(£70, in one case the fx4300 only beats the stock p-K) all beat the £50 Intel chip when it's overclocked at 4.7Ghz.
Exactly how is that keeping up with? 23fps vs 40, or 70 vs 50?
From the watchdogs bench you could extrapolate that a 8320 should provide almost double the performance of the overclocked pentium K and costs just over twice as much.
So you're agreeing that a £50 can keep up with an FX 8350 and even the 4770K in some games, but your portraying this negatively.. Ok then..
Also while the FX 8320 is double the price as you pointed out, but will net you some more performance in some multi-threaded software. it's also on a dead platform. The Pentium K is a good entry level point for people on low budgets. Allowing them to buy into a 'relevant' chipset with future upgrade options, and get a taste of overclocking all on a budget. Then later if wanted / needed buy another chip.
Their is very little to moan bout here, but some of you will just keep trying