Soldato
- Joined
- 30 Dec 2003
- Posts
- 6,374
- Location
- Bigger box!
Bodies in rivers or not, we are in 2006 now. There are some absolutely amazing things the feds can do, with DNA in particular, but forensics in general.
Bear in mind people, that in order to arrest a person you simlply need reasonable grounds to 'suspect' a person of an offence.
I know nothing about it personally, obviously, but i have a great deal of faith in the abilities of the police. More so forensicaly than anything else. They may have arrested him on whatever evidence they have that's simply given them grounds to suspect, but they would not go to the CPS with anything short of concrete evidence, and the CPS would not agree to charge with anything they even remotely thought wouldn't stand up in court.
Wait and see if he's charged, if he is then my money says they have some fantastic evidence to back that charge.
Whether he did it or not is not for me, you or the media to decide, that's on the jury.
Bear in mind people, that in order to arrest a person you simlply need reasonable grounds to 'suspect' a person of an offence.
I know nothing about it personally, obviously, but i have a great deal of faith in the abilities of the police. More so forensicaly than anything else. They may have arrested him on whatever evidence they have that's simply given them grounds to suspect, but they would not go to the CPS with anything short of concrete evidence, and the CPS would not agree to charge with anything they even remotely thought wouldn't stand up in court.
Wait and see if he's charged, if he is then my money says they have some fantastic evidence to back that charge.
Whether he did it or not is not for me, you or the media to decide, that's on the jury.


