This is flawed logic. You can get most, if not all of these products without any cattle.
Its also flawed because several things are in the wrong list and some simply aren't accurate.
Many of the things are incredibly old, internal organs for instruments and tennis racquet strings, in the 1850's, yes, your average £20 Slazenger for the past 40 years has used synthetically made strings. Much of the list is old sources of things. Manure, I find it hard to believe its particularly economically viable to kill a cow to get the small amount of manure it hasn't evacuated yet, it might be a bit more productive to pick up the animals waste which is continually produced.
I think it would be hard to classify manure as a non vegetarian substance, nor one anyone would eat either, until cows can talk and we get surprised that they wanted to horde all their manure themselves and are upset about it, I think that ones probably ok
I'm a vege, never much liked eating meat, I have no problem with subordinating anyone and find it hilarious that its deemed an innappropriate reason to eat meat. I think forced breeding, keeping a far higher population of animals than is required, in captivity, to be slaughtered is pretty disgusting and don't really want to be part of it.
Billions of humans on the planet are essentially subordinated( to Treat or regard as of lesser importance than something else), infact most of us feel that way about other humans, and I certainly do. I consider chavs much lower than me, I don't see that as a reason to breed(they do it well enough themselves) and then kill(ok maybe) and then eat(definately not) them.
The simple fact is, some animals eat meat, some don't, more do than don't, very few have opposeable thumbs, few have the inteligence/ability to grow food that would easily sustain them, let them live very healthily and not be required to eat meat.
The simple difference between us and most animals is our abilities and inteligence give us the CHOICE between eating meat, and not, most animals do not have that choice. Given the choice to make, I choose not to eat animals that were bred purely to be killed.
If I had no choice, the land wasn't producing plantlife and somehow a species of animal survived I'd eat them.
Survival of the fittest, anything goes, we haven't been in that situation for centuries now.
Don't really care if other people are vegetarian, or vegan, I mostly only care about hypocrisy and preachyness of people trying to impose their will on mine.
We shouldn't subordinate animals though, as a reason?
Its illogical to not think yourself better than, a pig, errm, we generally are from a evolutionary, inteligence and most general standards of what would be better or worse.
However, in much the same way I consider myself better than a chav, more inteligent than someone with down syndrome, I don't draw any link between thinking myself better, and deciding that makes it okay to EAT THEM.
SO how you've decided not eating meat has anything to do with considering yourself better/worse than animals makes no logical sense at all. One has nothing to do with the other, at all.
