I'm not sure what your question is.
Are you saying that if there is a private court that breaks the law, and this comes to the knowledge of law enforcement, they would turn a blind eye to it?
Do you have any evidence to support this claim?
ISIL, ISIS, Daesh discussion thread.
- Thread starter RoboCod
- Start date
I'm not sure what your question is.
Are you saying that if there is a private court that breaks the law, and this comes to the knowledge of law enforcement, they would turn a blind eye to it?
Do you have any evidence to support this claim?
Well lets be honest...Rotherham is a stinky fine example of "don't poke it, it will be fine".
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 37,804
- Location
- block 16, cell 12
From the examples i already provided we can see that sexist outcomes are commonplace. The entire process is. Therefore the courts break discrimination rights, capiche?
But it's it widely known that Assad pays for government services in enemy held territories. He does keep electricity, gas etc flowing where possible. Can you imagine the uproar if he did not do this and people were dying because of it.
I'm sure managing "the uproar" is central to Assad's war plan, that's why he hasn't killed most of the quarter of a million people who have died in the conflict so far.
Site looks carp, does it say what type of Russian they are ie chechen terrorists or other muslim fundies or just some regular crims or an official russian engineering company?
This has been going on the entire war and is not just with ISIS. So you are wrong. Like it or lump it Assad has been at least attempting to keep the national infrastructure going.
Also have you and independent statistics to confirm that Assad have killed nearly all the 250,000 people? or are you just quoting the anti Assad propaganda?
Last edited:
Don't you get it Assad is personally guilty of every single death in the middle east since the pipeline proxies were unleashed, just like Putin is responsible for the deaths and corruption in facist occupied ukraine or FOCU as it's known.
In that weird press conference where the foreign ministers spoke about Syria did everyone notice how more screwed up and emotional hammond got with each escalation of his lies, Perfidious Albion indeed.
Last edited:
Yeah, there's plenty of evidence of the scale and depravity of the Assad regime's war crimes. Something tells me though that whatever I give you, whether it be from the UN, Human Rights Organisations, Medical Organisations will be dismissed as "anti Assad propaganada", so I don't think I'll bother
Why do you ask have you run out of your usual supply?
Oh it's you, talking rubbish again.
Haha v v funny coming from you of all people.
Yeah, there's plenty of evidence of the scale and depravity of the Assad regime's war crimes. Something tells me though that whatever I give you, whether it be from the UN, Human Rights Organisations, Medical Organisations will be dismissed as "anti Assad propaganada", so I don't think I'll bother
Do you mean like the laughable Syrian Observatory for Human Rights? run by a single Wahhabi terrorist in London? etc.
No one is saying life in Syria is wonderful, the whole country is at war. To say Assad is responsible for the 250,000 deaths is ludicrous. He is currently fighting predominantly people who were no even born in Syria and are there to fight a holy war in effect and no im not simply talking about ISIS. I'm talking about the 10's if not 100s of like minded organisations.
The simple fact is the country would be in a far worse state if Assad was to go.
Last edited:
No, categorically No as anyone other than a doofus of the highest order would recognise that I was poking fun at the hyperbolic anti Assad and Putin merchants of the British press and body politic who need a simple personalised objet to hit with their pathetic bile.
You do talk rubbish....oh dear.
If it's unlabelled and or unknowable then how is it encoraging Islam? Muslims aren't going to buy the meat either as they don't know whether it is halal...
If you are that intensely against it then only buy from places that guarantee it isn't halal. As someone that can't eat some things (allergy) I have to do that regularly. I have a low amount of time for people who complain due to their lifestyle choice (which this is for you) and don't just ask.
As I said before, how is it affecting you? You obviously aren't interested in the animal welfare side so it's only the religious part. Someone muttering a few words over an animal isn't going to change anything for any of us non Muslims. I just don't see there being an issue.
Thanks for the quote but your assessment is rejected on grounds of never having seen sense typed by your fingers so I have great doubt over your ability to percieve the validity of words when typed by someone else.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 37,804
- Location
- block 16, cell 12
Well because its cheaper - and by permitting it to become mass market and take over from non halal meats - it is encouraging muslims to come here. It legitimises the methods amd religion.
It's become a question, where can i go? Kfc, subway, etc all halal in the area...
You ask me why it bothers me, equally why would it bother anyone else if it wasn't? I don't want my food feted to a false god or prophet. Why would i want that? You might think it trivial, but if it's that trivial why does it need to be halal at all?
By pandering and not blocking its mass market resale. We are promoting the country as extremely islam friendly. Same with shariah courts.