I imagine the Iraqi army wasn't really in the mood to protect a couple of CNN reporters though, it was bad enough that their country was the first live-TV war, no need to insult them further.
Wut?
I imagine the Iraqi army wasn't really in the mood to protect a couple of CNN reporters though, it was bad enough that their country was the first live-TV war, no need to insult them further.
Wut?
I'm sorry, did you somehow forget 2003?
The whole year was practically about Iraq, MSM made a killing.
Imagine the rhetoric in here if it was a US fleet levelling Allepo. Deary me.
Why do you always miss the most salient point? The US hasn't been asked by the legitimate Syrian government for help in fighting the terrorists that are invading Syria. Russia has!
Why do you always miss the most salient point? The US hasn't been asked by the legitimate Syrian government for help in fighting the terrorists that are invading Syria. Russia has!
Remind me again what happened to the opposition who stood up against that 'legitimate' government during the last election.
They stood up in an unfashionable time, as if Assad wasn't wary at that point from Libya and Egypt.
He took the legitimate stand of protecting his country, regardless if it was mostly protecting himself.
No he didn't. His regime set about abducting and murdering peaceful protesters who wanted nothing but a legitimate and open election.
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_uprising_phase_of_the_Syrian_Civil_War
No such thing as peaceful in the Middle East, its no different to the Saudis killing their opponents as "terrorists".
Aren't we allies with one of these?
Oh dear.
Protest in Bustan al-Qasr, besieged East Aleppo,demands the removal of "corrupt" rebel leaders. Citizen reportedly stormed aid centre
Love the black and white logic though: "rebels bad, so Assad must be good!"
yes, of course it's all so simple.
Rebels Bad, Assad, not so bad.
(And in particular, not bad for us at all, unlike at least some of the rebels, who are very bad for us indeed!)