• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

It looks like the 'real' /affordable RDNA3 + next gen NV desktop launch won't launch until September. Thoughts?

Soldato
Joined
15 Oct 2019
Posts
11,910
Location
Uk
Intel launched that card at £450 ffs.... it was as' if not more expensive at the time than an RTX 3060Ti and slower than a £300 RX 6600XT.

Its was that until about 2 months ago... Intel are not the great saviour, very obviously not, we are cheering on someone who is worse than Nvidia and treating the only people who have tried to be different as an inconvenient thorn in the side to an agenda. WTF is wrong with us????
The launch msrps were $329 for the 8gb and $349 for the 16gb.
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
30 Jun 2019
Posts
7,876
Only because it’s pretty much out of stock everywhere currently but was £330 a couple of weeks ago, regardless the 8gb version is easily available at £280 and packs double the die size, bus and requires a more complex PCB than a 7600 due to this and the higher TDP.
Most people will just be buying the RX 6700 XT instead, even if you get a could get a good price on the Arc 16GB version.

Also, cards like the RX 6750 XT are around 20% faster than the Arc according to techpowerup, and can be bought for ~£340 at the moment.

One thing to note about the top Arc GPUs - The transistor density on 6nm isn't very good at 53.4M / mm². But there's the possibility of doubling this (or more) with a better fab process. The RX 7900 XTX has a transistor density of 109.1M / mm² on TSMC 5nm, so I'm sure Intel could surpass this on a denser fab process, like 3nm.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
9 Nov 2009
Posts
24,917
Location
Planet Earth
The launch msrps were $329 for the 8gb and $349 for the 16gb.

AMD has to priced this around $250 at most. If not failure!

failure-steven-he.gif
 
Associate
Joined
13 Jun 2012
Posts
353
Soldato
Joined
16 Sep 2018
Posts
12,709
One thing to note about the top Arc GPUs - The transistor density on 6nm isn't very good at 53.4M / mm². But there's the possibility of doubling this (or more) with a better fab process. The RX 7900 XTX has a transistor density of 109.1M / mm² on TSMC 5nm, so I'm sure Intel could surpass this on a denser fab process, like 3nm.
The problem Intel has with density is they're relatively new to the fabrication of dedicated GPU game so their probably getting lower density because they don't have the experience of how tightly packed things can be before things cause problems.

While a reduction in node size will help they'd probably gain more from simply understanding what parts of the die can coexist closer to each other.
 
Soldato
Joined
9 Nov 2009
Posts
24,917
Location
Planet Earth
Soldato
OP
Joined
30 Jun 2019
Posts
7,876
The RTX 4060 TI isn't great is it? The RTX 3060 TI gets higher 1% lows in some games:

Generally a little slower than a RTX 3070.
 
Last edited:
Suspended
Joined
17 Mar 2012
Posts
48,333
Location
ARC-L1, Stanton System
The launch msrps were $329 for the 8gb and $349 for the 16gb.

£450 at the time, i don't who or how that happened, but MSRP is not always the sales price.

To give you an example, always in all of Intel's CPU launch gumph they cite a price, what they don't say, unless you read the fine print, which is usually a URL for external fine print, is the fact that this is the price the retailer pays per 1000 unit bulk.
 
Last edited:
Suspended
Joined
17 Mar 2012
Posts
48,333
Location
ARC-L1, Stanton System
The RTX 4060 TI isn't great is it? The RTX 3060 TI gets higher 1% lows in some games:

Generally a little slower than a RTX 3070.

And the same $500 for the 16GB one, $15, at most memory cost to Nvidia, $100 more to you and me, $85 extra $ if you buy the only one you can realistically live with unless you're an ESports gamer.

Its slower than the $500 card its replaced, let that sink in people. that's where we are at.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
OP
Joined
30 Jun 2019
Posts
7,876
Yes, RX 6700 performance seems like a good bet.

These cards are going for ~£290 now, so the RX 7600 will need to be priced at this level, or a little below.

Simply replacing the RX 6600 XT at ~£250 would make the most sense.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
OP
Joined
30 Jun 2019
Posts
7,876
I'm thinking that AMD will want to launch FSR3 alongside Navi32 cards, which are likely to sell well (as navi 22 did):


The potential of it being implemented at the driver level is interesting.
 
Last edited:
Suspended
Joined
17 Mar 2012
Posts
48,333
Location
ARC-L1, Stanton System
Yes, RX 6700 performance seems like a good bet.

These cards are going for ~£290 now, so the RX 7600 will need to be priced at this level, or a little below.

Simply replacing the RX 6600 XT at ~£250 would make the most sense.

I just can't see the 7600 being any better than the $300 4060 which means its a $250 card, its got to be if AMD want to sell them in any numbers.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom