• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Ivybridge underwhelming

I'm glad I went with Ivy, coming from a q6600 the difference even at stock is noticeable and my q6600 was clocked to 3.5ghz. Can't wait to have a go at clocking the i5
 
Some people are obsessed with numbers I suppose. Just because it wont do 5.5GHz at 1V with the stock cooler its a fail. I'll be more than happy with 4.5GHz which is more than anyone really needs anyway.

Agree. Since building my Ivy rig yesterday I've yet to find a game that even comes close to pushing the CPU at stock speeds. Why anyone thinks they need a 5GHz overclock for gaming is beyond me.
 
Depends on your perspective. Frankly, I think people have been a bit spoilt by Sandybridge; a few years ago, the idea of clocking a quad-core CPU at 5GHz for daily use would have been some kind of wild fantasy. I really don't think that a 4.5 GHz quad-core CPU is a fail, tbh.

What this does call into question is the way in which Intel rate the stock frequency. Why, say, 3.4 GHz when the chip will easily do 4 GHz at stock voltages? There's some artifice here.
 
Moved from a Q6600 @ 3.5 and at stock my GPUs are now finally being driven properly by the 3570k. As above, no need to overclock at this stage until I have more powerful GPUs to drive that might need it. It runs at 4.0 without any voltage increase, will see tonight how far it can go on stock volts out of interest.
 
Agree. Since building my Ivy rig yesterday I've yet to find a game that even comes close to pushing the CPU at stock speeds. Why anyone thinks they need a 5GHz overclock for gaming is beyond me.

Some people are obsessed with numbers I suppose. Just because it wont do 5.5GHz at 1V with the stock cooler its a fail. I'll be more than happy with 4.5GHz which is more than anyone really needs anyway.
This is something that also baffles me. People said similar things about SB-E when it was released, because the i7-3930k doesn't reach 5GHz as easily as the 2700k does. Perhaps these people weren't around during the so called "gigahertz wars", where Athlons were crushing P4s running at much higher clock rates, and we learned that it's not all about raw clock rate.
 
Sorry to jump in - just a quick question which I didn't think was worth it's own thread.

I was all set to purchase either Sandy or Ivy as the basis of a brand new system to replace my PC which is coming up to seven years old. Am I correct in thinking that Haswell is likely to be a different socket?
 
This is something that also baffles me. People said similar things about SB-E when it was released, because the i7-3930k doesn't reach 5GHz as easily as the 2700k does. Perhaps these people weren't around during the so called "gigahertz wars", where Athlons were crushing P4s running at much higher clock rates, and we learned that it's not all about raw clock rate.

I think most people understand its not about the clock however I believe lots of people build as a hobby/to bench etc.
 
This is something that also baffles me. People said similar things about SB-E when it was released, because the i7-3930k doesn't reach 5GHz as easily as the 2700k does. Perhaps these people weren't around during the so called "gigahertz wars", where Athlons were crushing P4s running at much higher clock rates, and we learned that it's not all about raw clock rate.

Yep - I have a feeling a lot of the people saying "Ivy fail" are too young to remember those days ;)

4+ GHz Pentiums being blown away by 2 GHz Athlons! :D
 
Another assumption is that if you'Ve bought an Ivy CPU you must be mad moving from Sandy, when a lot of people like myself never bought Sandy and are upgrading from much older chips!

The 3770k vs 2600k is interesting because of the price gap, the 2500k and 3570k are so closely priced on most decent sites that for most the Ivy is the logical choice.
 
Would love to see the difference going from 2500K (HD 3000 igpu) to 3570K (HD 4000 igpu) using Lucid Universal MVP alongside a Graphics Card like a GTX 680 in games.
 
Last edited:
Another assumption is that if you'Ve bought an Ivy CPU you must be mad moving from Sandy, when a lot of people like myself never bought Sandy and are upgrading from much older chips!

The 3770k vs 2600k is interesting because of the price gap, the 2500k and 3570k are so closely priced on most decent sites that for most the Ivy is the logical choice.

I grabbed my IB i7 when it was the same price as the SB i7s. winning on savings xD
 
Heh, I hadn't noticed the price of the 3770K had creeped up a bit, think it was £249.99 when I ordered it on sunday.
 
Back
Top Bottom