do you have trouble reading woolfie? i never mentioned anything about prison cctv.
No I don't have trouble reading, but I do sometimes skim through ct related stuff, as usually it's the same old nonsense worded slightly differently, my bad in this case.
What CCTV evidence from his flat went missing?
And was it "missing" or simply not relevant, as one of the things I've noticed a lot with the Pizza gate type stuff is how much stuff that is utterly non relevant gets brought up as "proof" of something "dodgy" when it's not, for example why would the investigators release footage where nothing happened, let alone legal issues with footage where nothing illegal was going on but private individuals are shown in circumstances where they had the legal right to privacy (generally automatically assumed to be in effect if someone is inside a private residence or building in areas the public do not have access to*).
About the only mention I can find of CCTV footage from his apartments is that some was released during the trial of maxwell?
I very much doubt that he kept CCTV footage of anything incriminating to himself, or anyone he might have been dealing with on his system, and most systems automatically record over anything that's not been marked to save when the storage starts to fill up (even stuff marked to save can be recorded over depending on the system if storage is getting full and there is no unflagged stuff). So expecting any CCTV system to have nice juicy stuff is being rather hopeful, and even if stuff does "go missing" there can be simple reasons for it, for example IIRC police incompetence (one force turned out to have lost years worth of rape kits/not sent them for testing from memory).
*Legally that bit is important, as "private" property can be considered "public" for certain things under certain conditions. The most obvious in the UK is a farmers field or similar, where if there is a gate that is closed and no members of the public have access, it's "private", but if you open that gate and allow people in for an event it becomes "public" for the duration and the farmers son now has to have a license and insurance to drive that tractor around the field, the same sort of thing IIRC holds true for cameras and recordings, in a private residence you have an expectation of privacy that includes not having video of you being played to the public for fun and to satisfy the curiosity of the bored.
You've got access to Google right?
When you make a claim it's often nice to provide proof.
Also "FBI codewords" doesn't mean much as IIRC the FBI etc all use a variety of codewords at different times, and I'd be amazed if at some point in the last 115 years the FBI didn't use food related phrases or words as a code in an investigation (Mafia would probably be an all too obvious one), and there is a high probability that they reuse the same "codewords" multiple times (historically that has been a real issue in the military and intelligence), possibly simultaneously in different investigations at different offices.
I can quite see the FBI having used food related terms in something like a sex trafficking case (or for that matter, drugs, guns, stolen goods...), as it would make a certain kind of sense and be hard to realise what they were talking about out of context, but even then that doesn't mean anything with regards to pizza gate unless you can actually provide a link that isn't "well they used those words, and those words were used in emails and messages about what people wanted to eat".
The fun part about creating a conspiracy theory that sounds possible is usually to include just enough factual stuff to bait it and draw people in, so you hear about a case where the FBI used certain terms and you might, if you wanted to create a nice juicy CT use those terms as the basis for your CT and build the "evidence" for it up around them, in the hope that your marks will see that the FBI used those words at some point and think it's proof for the nonsense you're working on.