Jimmy Savile - Sexual Predator

What's unfair and unfounded about it? Seems like a reasonable description of the circumstances to me.

The BBC is in meltdown. They've just falsely accused a peer of paedophilia without any evidence whatsoever! That's unfair and unfounded.

Meanwhile, Entwhistle has clearly resigned in an attempt to take the heat off the rest of the organisation. I don't know what kind of government watchdog polices the BBC, but whatever it is, it should demand that the axe is swung wide and deep.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the BBC didn't accuse anybody of peadophilia (that was the invidual who has turned around & said "oh wait, it wasn't him" now).

The story was based off the victims testomony who then retracted the allegations.

Witness testemony is a form of evidence.
 
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the BBC didn't accuse anybody of peadophilia (that was the invidual who has turned around & said "oh wait, it wasn't him" now).

The story was based off the victims testomony who then retracted the allegations.

Witness testemony is a form of evidence.

Aren't you supposed to cross-reference this statement though?

I mean I could call you out for touching children, but it would be completely wrong. Should a local rag take this unfounded and wildly inaccurate statement as true?

The guy was hundreds of miles away, why was this not checked?
 
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the BBC didn't accuse anybody of peadophilia (that was the invidual who has turned around & said "oh wait, it wasn't him" now).

The story was based off the victims testomony who then retracted the allegations.

Witness testemony is a form of evidence.

Painting someone as a kiddie fiddler, because someone said so on national tv?

Yeah, there's no danger in that!
 
It is an odd situation though.

The BBC doesn't run a story about Savile beacuse there is just victim testimony and gets ripped apart beacuse of it. They then run a story which names nobody and has victim testimony and gets ripped apart. Seems to me they should stop running any stories, it's lose lose otherwise....
 
What's unfair and unfounded about it? Seems like a reasonable description of the circumstances to me.

The BBC is in meltdown. They've just falsely accused a peer of paedophilia without any evidence whatsoever! That's unfair and unfounded.

Meanwhile, Entwhistle has clearly resigned in an attempt to take the heat off the rest of the organisation. I don't know what kind of government watchdog polices the BBC, but whatever it is, it should demand that the axe is swung wide and deep.
No, to be frank, it sounds like an internet couch jokey rant.


Was a mistake made? Of course... But such things happen. And now we have a silly witch hunt again. This rings back to the dodgy dosier resignation(s) all over again where everyone but the necessary people in the necessary organisations resigned.

"The BBC is in meltdown" - You seem to be in the realms of suggesting we'll turn the TV on and find test card transmission... :rolleyes: Calm down, and you'll see how trivial in reality it all is, unless people get all over excited about it (like you).
 
They've just falsely accused a peer of paedophilia without any evidence whatsoever! That's unfair and unfounded.

It would have been but they didn't actually do that.

Whilst the handling of this has been poor at best they do seem damned if they do and damned if they don't.

I ask again - why do you care?
 
The BBC must undergo a radical overhaul in the wake of "shoddy" journalism which led to the resignation of its chief or its future will be in doubt, the head of the state-funded broadcaster's governing body said on Sunday.

...

"If you're saying, does the BBC need a thorough structural radical overhaul, then absolutely it does and that is what we will have to do," Mr Patten, a one-time senior figure in British prime minister David Cameron's Conservative Party and the last British governor of Hong Kong, told BBC TV.

...

Mr Entwistle was condemned for the BBC's slow response to the Savile furore and then lambasted after it emerged that Newsnight had axed a planned expose into Savile shortly after his death and that the broadcaster had gone ahead with tributes instead.

His appearance before a parliamentary committee provoked mockery, with one lawmaker saying he had shown a "lamentable lack of knowledge" of what was going on at his own organisation.

...

The knives were out for the director general on Friday after the BBC apologised for the mistaken allegation that an ex-politician, later identified on the Internet as a close ally of former prime minister Margaret Thatcher, had abused children, and had not asked him for a comment before broadcast.

The last straw came when Mr Entwistle was forced to admit on BBC radio that he had not been told about the Newsnight report before it aired nor known - or asked - who the alleged abuser was until the name appeared in social media.

(Source).
 
[TW]Fox;23143235 said:
Using presumably a peice of 'where was XYZ in Year 1982' software or something?

Good journalism would have been to Lord McApline the right to reply to the allegations and then checked up on what he said. Or perhaps showing the man making the accusations a photo and asking "Is this the man?"

Regardless Entwhistle had to go because he was blindly unaware of the fact his already in the news programme was about to run another story of some note or that, once it was run, the Guardian was running a "This story was rubbish" article the following day.
 
What?
You've got that sick of hearing his name that you've come in a thread about Savile and posted about him.
Yeah right.

Where have I ever discussed or "posted about him"?

I simply entered this thread, posted my current situation regarding news in general and left. ;)
 
Dave Lee Travis arrested in Jimmy Savile police inquiry.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-20336798

Former Radio 1 DJ Dave Lee Travis has been arrested as part of the police probe set up in the wake of the Jimmy Savile scandal, the BBC understands.

Police said a man in his 60s from Bedfordshire was being held on suspicion of sexual offences.

Police have now identified about 450 potential victims of sexual abuse.

The Met said their investigation into alleged abuse by Savile and others - Operation Yewtree - had so far recorded 200 allegations of sexual assault.

The arrest of Mr Travis, 67, is the fourth so far in connection with the Savile investigation.

In a statement, the Met said the latest arrest "falls under the strand of the investigation we have termed 'Others'", meaning the allegations are unrelated to Savile.

But the force said that the "vast majority" of the 450 possible victims were alleging sexual abuse by former BBC TV presenter and DJ Savile, who died last year aged 84.
 
Aren't you supposed to cross-reference this statement though?

I mean I could call you out for touching children, but it would be completely wrong. Should a local rag take this unfounded and wildly inaccurate statement as true?

The guy was hundreds of miles away, why was this not checked?
I agree it's poor reporting.

But they didn't name him at all & they did have a witness naming him as the offender.

Some silly comments on here about the BBC accusing somebody of paedophilia - because the BBC didn't accuse anybody of anything, the individual who retracted the allegations did.
 
I agree it's poor reporting.

But they didn't name him at all & they did have a witness naming him as the offender.

Some silly comments on here about the BBC accusing somebody of paedophilia - because the BBC didn't accuse anybody of anything, the individual who retracted the allegations did.


irrelevant - libel law is very clear - by repeating the accusation they have made the accusation.
 
Back
Top Bottom