Correct me if I'm wrong, but the BBC didn't accuse anybody of peadophilia (that was the invidual who has turned around & said "oh wait, it wasn't him" now).What's unfair and unfounded about it? Seems like a reasonable description of the circumstances to me.
The BBC is in meltdown. They've just falsely accused a peer of paedophilia without any evidence whatsoever! That's unfair and unfounded.
Meanwhile, Entwhistle has clearly resigned in an attempt to take the heat off the rest of the organisation. I don't know what kind of government watchdog polices the BBC, but whatever it is, it should demand that the axe is swung wide and deep.
The story was based off the victims testomony who then retracted the allegations.
Witness testemony is a form of evidence.