Frankly it's appalling this decision was still even in his own hands.
Frankly it's appalling this decision was still even in his own hands.
I'd say Suarez easily gets as much if not more abuse, and there wasn't even any evidence of what he said, I mean we saw what Terry said and also sleeping with his team-mates bird.
Why do people keep peddling this as fact? Just goes to show you how people absorb the front pages but aren't interested in the retractions buried on page 52.
You do realise the story with that Perroncel women was a load of rubbish don't you and a couple of the tabloids had to later apologise to them both and admit is wasn't actually true?
Why do people keep peddling this as fact? Just goes to show you how people absorb the front pages but aren't interested in the retractions buried on page 52.
You do realise the story with that Perroncel women was a load of rubbish don't you and a couple of the tabloids had to later apologise to them both and admit is wasn't actually true?
I'd be surprised. One good thing to come from this is that if/when Ferdinand isn't called up, the theory that his exclusion was because of Terry can be put to bed.
I'd say Suarez easily gets as much if not more abuse, and there wasn't even any evidence of what he said, I mean we saw what Terry said and also sleeping with his team-mates bird.
I thought Suarez had admitted to using the term that Evra found offensive but stated that it had a different meaning in Uruguayan culture than it does in Western Europe? However I don't really want to distract from the thread too much so if it's going to be a long drawn out debate I'll leave it.