Just won.....£430 from a casino

I might be being thick, but doesn't that mean by playing blackjack, it won't count towards the wager and won't get me the bonus (even though this site says to play blackjack?)

Almost all of the top 20 bonuses on BB do allow blackjack, so you should play those ones first. It's possible to do bonus bagging on other games (three card poker etc.) but there's a much greater chance of busting out so you should leave those until later.
 
What does:

"The sign up bonus is only withdrawable as part of a winning bet."

mean exactly? Does that mean I have to wager the bonus? Or that I have to bet all that at once? Or...?
 
What does:

"The sign up bonus is only withdrawable as part of a winning bet."

mean exactly? Does that mean I have to wager the bonus? Or that I have to bet all that at once? Or...?

Sounds like a Sportsbook bonus to me rather than a casino? I'd assume it means you have to place the whole bonus amount on a particular event. If you win, you can withdraw.
 
Sounds like a Sportsbook bonus to me rather than a casino? I'd assume it means you have to place the whole bonus amount on a particular event. If you win, you can withdraw.

It's definitely part of the Casino aswell - so I have to bet the entire amount at once and win to be able to withdraw it (with other winnings too)?
 
I've been looking at various sites, many from here http://www.beatingbonuses.com/bestbonus.htm as the ones on www.fundmydegree.com are outdated - and they all seem to say that blackjack doesn't count towards to the wager amount?
Hi. I own the BB site and found this link while looking over my monthly stats. I go through the best bonus list once per month to confirm accurate information and usually hear about bonus changes from players within a couple days of the change, so I am confident the list is not outdated. I suspect you are confusing poor game weightings with a game being restricted. Do you have an example of "outdated" information?
 
Last edited:
Yeah, I think I have the right settings... although perhaps I should check.. whenever I watch it play it seems to be playing correctly... although I have noticed that sometimes I seem to stand on 16 when dealer shows a 10 9 or 8 or something like that... is that normal?
That doesn't sound right to me because if you have 16 and the dealer has 2,3,4,5 or 6 you would stand. If the the dealer has 7,8,9,10 or Ace you would hit.

I have read elsewhere that if you don't set your res correctly it will play incorrectly, how true this is i don't know but from what you are saying it might be.
If they have composition dependent exceptions programmed in (don't know if that is the case or not), then they would stand on many 16 vs 10 hands. If it was playing perfect CD strategy, it would play something like the rules listed below for 3-card 16 vs 10s with multi-deck BJ instead of always standing/hitting. The lower number rules override the following rules.
1. Any hand with a 5 -- Stand
2. Any hand with a 6 or 10 -- Hit
3. All other hands -- Stand

Do you have an example of a specific hand?
 
£20 hands! You were either very lucky, very rich or very stupid.

Either way, well done!
£20 hands sounds like danger to me!
I'm religiously playing my £1 hands on Gala - only got about 500 to go, so nearly there for my £100 bonus, and only around £20 down so far.
There is nothing wrong with larger bets, if you have the bankroll to support it. Most professional advantage players that I know, almost always bet £20 per hand or more. An increased bet size increases your hourly rate. If you bet £1 per hand, your expected hourly rate would likely be £10-15/hr (depends on speed of play) and you'd lose at least a full night to complete the wagering. While if you bet £20 per hand, your expected hourly rate would increase to ~£300/hr and you'd spend under a half hour to complete the wagering.

The downside of a larger bet size is an increased variance and dramatically increased risk of a loss. So a large bet size is not for everyone and is a bad choice, if you do not have a large bankroll. You can compare chance of win/loss with different bet sizes using my return & variance calc at http://www.beatingbonuses.com/calc.htm .
 
Cheers for the advice... it's the increased risk of a loss that's the killer for me at the mo.
I'm sticking with the smaller bet sizes for now, keeps the swings more manageable :)
 
Yeah i am also sticking to the smaller bets for now till i can put my money used back in the bank and all the money being played with is from earning at the casino's.

I also found this site today and have tried the system for an hour or so tonight and it seems 100% good so far. (NO SCAM AS ALL THE INFO IS FREE FOR NOW).
thewealthsecret.org, it's all based on Roulette and i have won 13 times out of 13 so far, plus about 10 rounds with play money first because i was wary of it being a scam.

BTW i haven't tried his recommended Casino yet i used my account at Will Hills.
 
Last edited:
I'd be wary of using the casino (EuroGrand) suggested in that link - comes up on my Nod32 as virus/adware (Win32/PTCasino). I don't think that system is new at all, mate at work used to talk about it all the time. Only 'new' element is the 'wait 7 spins'. My mates idea was to always bet on a colour and double your bet each time :)
 
That's why i didn't want to try his recommended casino and i have heard of a familiar technique without the seven wait spins too that doesn't work but so far this seems good. I will let you know if it fails me.
 
Two comments:

1. There is no way to gain an edge in roulette, unless the game outcome is non-random (for example, a biased wheel, or being able to place bets after the wheel has started spinning in live roulette).

2. Spyware/Virus detection software often has a problem with Playtech casinos, like Eurogrand. I suspect this relates to checking your computer for bots and similar banned software. I very much doubt that it is anything harmful.
 
Yeah i am also sticking to the smaller bets for now till i can put my money used back in the bank and all the money being played with is from earning at the casino's.

I also found this site today and have tried the system for an hour or so tonight and it seems 100% good so far. (NO SCAM AS ALL THE INFO IS FREE FOR NOW).
thewealthsecret.org, it's all based on Roulette and i have won 13 times out of 13 so far, plus about 10 rounds with play money first because i was wary of it being a scam.

BTW i haven't tried his recommended Casino yet i used my account at Will Hills.

That works wonders, just tried it and won 3 times in a row. Very lengthy process but proparly much quicker than bonus bagging. Might phone a sicky tomorrow and sit doing this! :p
 
That works wonders, just tried it and won 3 times in a row. Very lengthy process but properly much quicker than bonus bagging. Might phone a sicky tomorrow and sit doing this! :p

I haven't played since my last post but will have another go soon. Please post how you get on with it.
My only problem is that the guy states on his site that you can easily make £300 per hour but i can't see that's possible because he says stick to £1 bets.
 
I looked over the roulette system link. There are so many flaws, I don't know where to begin.

To start with, reputable online casino SWs use a complex RNG or P-RNG that is verified by independent 3rd parties. Some softwares go so far as to use truly random events as seeds for the P-RNG. For example, Boss Media uses a measure of Zener diode based white noise. They go through such extreme measures, to make outcomes truly unpredictable. They do not simply choose the outcome that hasn't happened recently to make things look more fair.

The system involves increasing your bet size with each loss, until you are betting £100 per spin, if you have enough sequential losses to reach the final entry in the bet size table. They don't say what happens if you lose the £100 bet. Do you keep increasing your bet size until you are betting your all of your bankroll on a single spin? What happens if you lose that spin where you are betting everything?

The page says that casinos don't care that players are using their winning system. The reason casinos don't care is because the system doesn't work. Once in a while a game with a SW flaw comes out, so players can gain an edge. These games don't last long. Casinos realize when they are losing an abnormal amount of money on a game, and take measures quickly.

The results that have been posted, such as winning 3 hands are well within normal variance. They do not show that the system works. To show the system works you need to compile results for a large number of hands. You do not need to risk your money in real mode to do this. Simply record hands in practice mode. If anyone takes the trouble to compile a good amount of Win/Loss results I will give the chance of the result occurring a random distribution. This result can be used to show, if the system works or not.
 
Last edited:
I looked over the roulette system link. There are so many flaws, I don't know where to begin.

To start with, reputable online casino SWs use a complex RNG or P-RNG that is verified by independent 3rd parties. Some softwares go so far as to use truly random events as seeds for the P-RNG. For example, Boss Media uses a measure of Zener diode based white noise. They go through such extreme measures, to make outcomes truly unpredictable. They do not simply choose the outcome that hasn't happened recently to make things look more fair.

The system involves increasing your bet size with each loss, until you are betting £100 per spin, if you have enough sequential losses to reach the final entry in the bet size table. They don't say what happens if you lose the £100 bet. Do you keep increasing your bet size until you are betting your all of your bankroll on a single spin? What happens if you lose that spin where you are betting everything?

The page says that casinos don't care that players are using their winning system. The reason casinos don't care is because the system doesn't work. Once in a while a game with a SW flaw comes out, so players can gain an edge. These games don't last long. Casinos realize when they are losing an abnormal amount of money on a game, and take measures quickly.

The results that have been posted, such as winning 3 hands are well within normal variance. They do not show that the system works. To show the system works you need to compile results for a large number of hands. You do not need to risk your money in real mode to do this. Simply record hands in practice mode. If anyone takes the trouble to compile a good amount of Win/Loss results I will give the chance of the result occurring a random distribution. This result can be used to show, if the system works or not.



Thanks for your comments, it's nice to see what someone who knows a lot more about the casino's has to say on the subject but what would you consider a good amount of win/loss results? 10/20/30 or more plays as i have tried 23 goes so far without a loss?

I do also wonder about the £100 spins, what happens next. The most i have had to go up to is £1, £2, £3, £4, £6, £9, £13, £20 = £60 and that was getting me worried till it won.
 
I looked over the roulette system link. There are so many flaws, I don't know where to begin.

To start with, reputable online casino SWs use a complex RNG or P-RNG that is verified by independent 3rd parties. Some softwares go so far as to use truly random events as seeds for the P-RNG. For example, Boss Media uses a measure of Zener diode based white noise. They go through such extreme measures, to make outcomes truly unpredictable. They do not simply choose the outcome that hasn't happened recently to make things look more fair.

The system involves increasing your bet size with each loss, until you are betting £100 per spin, if you have enough sequential losses to reach the final entry in the bet size table. They don't say what happens if you lose the £100 bet. Do you keep increasing your bet size until you are betting your all of your bankroll on a single spin? What happens if you lose that spin where you are betting everything?

The page says that casinos don't care that players are using their winning system. The reason casinos don't care is because the system doesn't work. Once in a while a game with a SW flaw comes out, so players can gain an edge. These games don't last long. Casinos realize when they are losing an abnormal amount of money on a game, and take measures quickly.

The results that have been posted, such as winning 3 hands are well within normal variance. They do not show that the system works. To show the system works you need to compile results for a large number of hands. You do not need to risk your money in real mode to do this. Simply record hands in practice mode. If anyone takes the trouble to compile a good amount of Win/Loss results I will give the chance of the result occurring a random distribution. This result can be used to show, if the system works or not.

Started off at £25 last night and within about an hour I was at £55. I recon it works if you follow what he says.
 
Back
Top Bottom