Keeping up with the Markles

silvagti · 9 Mar 2021 at 20:21

Yeah, I fully expect we'll see many of the usual suspects re-appear on GBnews in the near future. Piers Morgan's storming off certainly feels like a bit of a publicity stunt.

I kind of agree wih some of his comments about Meghan though. I don't think it's acceptable to make defamatory accusations against a group of people / institution without providing proof nor context and refusing to name the person they claim made the comment. Looks to me like throwing mud to see what sticks.

I'd actually go so far as to say she deliberately doesn't want to name the person as she's worried about being dragged into court over an accusation which she can't substantiate!

omnomnom · 9 Mar 2021 at 20:24

Lysander said:
In the interests of balance, I've managed to find confirmation of two points I wanted answers to.

Firstly, that she was having suicidal thoughts, and that those words were either used by her or two her, that is confirmed.

Secondly that there were "concerns" over her kid's skin colour. Also confirmed:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowb...MJC3ko0m9yA9zGMhocqyUUDMgymCuesHKo1gMrBsVMg3I

So yes, I'm glad that I've got that sorted out. I feel a little bad for her now though, purely because having suicidal thoughts is awful. But that doesn't account for the falsehoods, inconsistencies and lies and the fact that I still think she is responsible for the massive rift in the Royal Family and that she has a terrible personal history which must be factored in. What a mess this whole situation is. An utter shambles.

Im more talking about her being absolutely dragged on this forum long before the interview was aired.

silvagti · 9 Mar 2021 at 20:26

Yeah, I fully expect we'll see many of the usual suspects re-appear on GBnews in the near future. Piers Morgan's storming off certainly feels like a bit of a publicity stunt.

I kind of agree wih some of his comments about Meghan though. I don't think it's acceptable to make defamatory accusations against a group of people / institution without providing proof nor context and refusing to name the person they claim made the comment. Looks to me like throwing mud to see what sticks.

I'd actually go so far as to say she deliberately doesn't want to name the person as she's worried about being dragged into court over an accusation which she can't substantiate!

inferno said:
Meghan dropped the race card and mental health card, I like Piers don't believe a word of it, but in 2021 if you mention it you are completely protected.

Agreed, don't believe a word she says as she's provided no proof and seemingly isn't willing to divulge any actual details.

Dirk Diggler · 9 Mar 2021 at 20:29

silvagti said:
I kind of agree wih some of his comments about Meghan though. I don't think it's acceptable to make defamatory accusations against a group of people / institution without providing proof nor context and refusing to name the person they claim made the comment. Looks to me like throwing mud to see what sticks.

You do realise Piers Morgan is a tabloid journalist?

Merlin5 · 9 Mar 2021 at 20:29

I think it's disgraceful they felt they needed to publically shame Buckinghan Palace to the whole world. There was just no need.

omnomnom · 9 Mar 2021 at 20:33

silvagti said:
Yeah, I fully expect we'll see many of the usual suspects re-appear on GBnews in the near future. Piers Morgan's storming off certainly feels like a bit of a publicity stunt.

I kind of agree wih some of his comments about Meghan though. I don't think it's acceptable to make defamatory accusations against a group of people / institution without providing proof nor context and refusing to name the person they claim made the comment. Looks to me like throwing mud to see what sticks.

I'd actually go so far as to say she deliberately doesn't want to name the person as she's worried about being dragged into court over an accusation which she can't substantiate!

Agreed, don't believe a word she says as she's provided no proof and seemingly isn't willing to divulge any actual details.

Ohhh so we need proof now. Thats funny as ive been asking for exactly that for the other side of the argument.

Merlin5 said:
I think it's disgraceful they felt they needed to publically shame Buckinghan Palace to the whole world. There was just no need.

They have every right. Did you not see the news prior to this? How many negative articles did the Mail have on their front page about them again? 37 wasnt it?

Who do you think started the press campaign against them last week...

Gerard · 9 Mar 2021 at 20:34

Meanwhile in "NI" a DUP member who also had a bit part in the movie "Deliverance" has his say...

Randomface74 · 9 Mar 2021 at 20:35

Pretty obvious the other presenters on GMB didn't like working with Piers. Glad he's gone.

Rummers · 9 Mar 2021 at 20:42

I find it hilarious they go to the States to escape the Media, then to go on Oprah :rolleyes:

omnomnom · 9 Mar 2021 at 20:45

Rummers said:
I find it hilarious they go to the States to escape the Media, then to go on Oprah

They left because of the British press constantly invading their privacy. They went on Oprah to tell their story and not have the constant nonsense published by the mail etc

Dis86 · 9 Mar 2021 at 20:46

omnomnom said:
They left because of the British press constantly invading their privacy. They went on Oprah to tell their story and not have the constant nonsense published by the mail etc

And then gave away private info of others?

omnomnom · 9 Mar 2021 at 20:48

Dis86 said:
And then gave away private info of others?

They could cure cancel and you'd find an issue.

inferno · 9 Mar 2021 at 20:48

omnomnom said:
They left because of the British press constantly invading their privacy. They went on Oprah to tell their story and not have the constant nonsense published by the mail etc

The British press was supportive until it became clear she is do as I say but not as I do. She was a hypocrite and that's when it all turned sour.

Meghan likened herself to Ariel from Disney, I feel sorry for the RF having to deal with her for so long.

Dis86 · 9 Mar 2021 at 20:48

omnomnom said:
They could cure cancel and you'd find an issue.

So...is that not correct?

antijoke · 9 Mar 2021 at 20:48

Dis86 said:
And then gave away private info of others?

I think the one thing everyone should be able to agree on is that the British press is full of the absolute worst this country has to offer and are absolute scum.

Dis86 · 9 Mar 2021 at 20:49

antijoke said:
I think the one thing everyone should be able to agree on is that the British press is full of the absolute worst this country has to offer and are absolute scum.

They're a shining beacon of erm...yeah no, they're awful.

omnomnom · 9 Mar 2021 at 20:51

Dis86 said:
So...is that not correct?

Hardly and considering youve formed your opinion on her through leaks and hearsay im not entirely sure why now its an issue.

My point all along has been about how people are forming opinions on other people leaking their private info including the Daily Mail leaking their bloody house address yet NOW its an issue

omnomnom · 9 Mar 2021 at 20:52

Dis86 said:
They're a shining beacon of erm...yeah no, they're awful.

What are you using to get this opinion of them?

Dis86 · 9 Mar 2021 at 20:53

omnomnom said:
Hardly and considering youve formed your opinion on her through leaks and hearsay im not entirely sure why now its an issue.

My point all along has been about how people are forming opinions on other people leaking their private info including the Daily Mail leaking their bloody house address yet NOW its an issue

What opinion would that be? It's fact that they went on and released information about private conversations and the actions of others.

Dis86 · 9 Mar 2021 at 20:53

omnomnom said:
What are you using to get this opinion of them?

My eyes.