Keeping up with the Markles

robfosters said:
I hope Murdoch gives Morgan his own morning show where he has free reign to say what he likes without fear of the permanently offended costing him his job
Click to expand...

Was “reign” a Freudian slip rob?
On Charles not taking Harry’s calls, of course, only Charles and Harry know the real truth about that, but there have been times when one or both of my two sons have annoyed me about something or other, but if my phone rang, and the screen showed that it was one of them, there’s no way in the world that I’d reject the call.
They’re my kids first, last, and always.
 
Jean-F said:
Was “reign” a Freudian slip rob?
On Charles not taking Harry’s calls, of course, only Charles and Harry know the real truth about that, but there have been times when one or both of my two sons have annoyed me about something or other, but if my phone rang, and the screen showed that it was one of them, there’s no way in the world that I’d reject the call.
They’re my kids first, last, and always.
Click to expand...
Wasn’t a slip, I used the correct spelling in the correct context. I speak propa English innit!
 
Ahleckz said:
The idea of a royal class who are better than us simply down to birth is wrong and outdated in today’s world. I really can’t see their relevance anymore.
Click to expand...

The only time I ever hear that idea is from people who advocate for abolishing the crown. I have never heard anyone else proclaim the idea "they are better than us because of their birth."
 
IMO, Markle's nothing but a scheming, narcissistic social climber who quickly found out she'd bit off more than she could chew joining the Royal Family and simply put in to action the plan, albeit a bit sooner than intended, she'd always had, Get back to America with the Royal Status she craved and cash in.

..You only have to look at the trail of wreckage she leaves to past relationships in her family & private life to realise that she's the problem, and that's she's determined to do the same again.

It's Harry, I feel sorry for. In private I bet he is mortified by what she's doing, but is now so pussy whipped by her, can't stand up to her.

Anyway it all goes to show that Americans & Royalty do not and will never mix.
 
robfosters said:
What happened to the old caveat of an employees views and opinions do not reflect those of the organisation they represent?
Click to expand...
Think that went out the window a long time ago. People can and do get regularly sacked for airing their views in public.
 
robfosters said:
What happened to the old caveat of an employees views and opinions do not reflect those of the organisation they represent?
Click to expand...

You're just making things up in your head in order to confirm your bias. His employer will have a code of conduct that everyone has to follow, particularly when they're actually carrying out their duties but not uncommon to have to follow it when off shift e.g. Twitter posts.
 
Psycho Sonny said:
Is it possible nobody explained this to them? Sure people are happy enough to explain it now after the fact but is it possible that they were rather blunt about it and never bothered explaining the rules properly to them?
Click to expand...
not really - why would oprah & harry allow those comments to be in the final edit when they must have known they were false, it makes it look more like a double bluff.
make her appear irrational; have the american media corrected the facts for their viewers ...doubt it, mud sticks.


Craterloads said:
He annoyed me a bit when questioning her disclosure of suffering from mental health issues / suicidal thoughts.
Click to expand...
if she has misled the audience on some issues then you have to question her credibility across the board ... nothing more than happens in a law court - no ?

Mental health quality does seem rather 'subjective', stats show correlation with socio-economic factors so the probability is, it is less likely to be present at the same level in meghan, recent footballers, pop stars, other recent reveals, versus those lower down the caste system. (Flack obviously tragic)
now if those high-up individuals have some self-reflection to expose they have means to access appropriate health services, I'm a lot more sympathetic.

Was meghan a pre-text to get rid of him ? or ITV don't want to loose possibility of airing future reveals.
 
Morgan should be nowhere near news TV, the fact ITV even gave him the job in the first place speaks volumes and they hold some responsibility for that. It appears they just wanted an antagonist to increase viewership, not sure if there's a difference in viewing figures between the days he's not on?

He's done some okay documentaries on prisoners and a couple of interesting life stories but that came from his incessant need to try and find everything out about someone.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom