Keeping up with the Markles

If Harry and Meghan are not prepared to give the details of who said what and the context it was said in as far as I am concerned it did not happen.

If this came up in a court of law it would be laughed out of town.

Standard HR approach, details are most important precisely to prevent witch-hunts.
 
Let them be and do what they want, although they've opened up a huge can of worms with not saying who it was that made the racial comment, instead it just leaves people to guess and will damage the royals to a certain extent.
 
And who gave her that race card to play? Fact is no one knows what happened and while we only have her side that doesn't mean it's just 'playing the race card'

Again - What if Harry asked her to not share the name? Then whos fault is it? Or is Harry still going to be squeaky clean?

Does not matter who the dealer is, it is up to you how you play your cards.

And there is nothing squeaky clean about Harry either.
 
I put the Daily Sport above most papers because it doesn't seriously pretend to be a newspaper. WW2 bomber found on the moon and all that sort of thing. Obviously not meant to be taken seriously.

My favourite was "Ghouls still Elvis' skull and replace it with football".

I mean, that's great reporting. Important stuff.
 
It sounds like you're clutching at straws to defend her, to be honest. :)

We only have what we can see in front of us. She brought it up and refused to give any specific details and then Harry came in and said he wouldn't say who said it [whatever 'it' is]. That's all we know.

Again, she brought it up. Look at the rampant debate it's caused and a formal statement from the royal family off the back of what? An insinuation. Nothing more. She is a master manipulator. A sorceress.

I'm not clutching at straws any more than some of the lengths you lot are going at to chastise her.

Harry is the one who told her about the statement, that much we know. Clearly from that statement Meghan thought something was off-key. It's not hard to come to the conclusion that Harry must've felt it was a grey area comment if he then told her.

Harry's reason (not Meghans) for not wanting to share who it was that said it was a curious one but lets not forget that it was indeed Harry who didn't want to reveal who said it.
 
Harry's reason (not Meghans) for not wanting to share who it was that said it was a curious one but lets not forget that it was indeed Harry who didn't want to reveal who said it.

you are so wrong!

Harry clearly told her about the conversation and must have told her about the person who said it. she knew as much as what harry does and only difference is that she wasnt there. She could have told everyone in the world who said it and how the conversation went.

Instead she chose to throw this bomb and let it rip - by laying the accusation. And then expect Harry to pick up the pieces by what falsely accusing either his brother or his dad for being a bigot by doing so protecting his wife and the mother to his unborn child from being accused of being a liar or go on world wide television and say the truth and say it was all a misunderstanding and Meghan got it wrong and exergerated the whole thing?

Harry did neither and just left it and all he said was that the conversation about skin tone came up and he was taken back by it. The latter comment was probably prompted by Meghan's reaction or over reaction that night, I would have thought Harry would have the balls to challenge Will and Charles if they said something clearly not fit at the time of the conversation. Harry isnt exactly timid or have towed the line when it comes to family matters and how a royal should behave in the public let alone in the private.
 
^

She is an Actor by trade and has had months to rehearse this gig.
The whole interview looked pre scripted to me and was probably done in many takes.

Meghan went first to lay down the accusations then Harry was brought on later to confirm them and add weight.
 
you are so wrong!

Harry clearly told her how about the conversation and must have told her about the person who said it. she knew as much as what harry does and only difference is that she wasnt there. She could have told everyone in the world who said it and how the conversation went.

Instead she chose to throw this bomb and let it rip - by laying the accusation. And then expect Harry to pick up the pieces by what accusing either his brother or his dad for being a bigot by doing so protecting his wife and the mother to his unborn child from being accused of beign a liar or go on world wide television and say the truth and say it was all a misunderstanding and Meghan got it wrong and exergerated the whole thing? Harry did neither and just left it and all he said was that the conversation about skin tone came up and he was taken back by it. (the latter comment was probably prompted by Meghan's reaction or over reaction that night, I would have thought Harry would have the balls to challenge Will and Charles if they said something clearly not fit at the time of the conversation)

How am I wrong? Did Harry not sit there on that chair and say he wouldn't reveal who said it? Am I making that up?

Harry had just as much of a chance as Meghan to say who said and what they said but he decided not to. The fact he refused to say who said anything leads me to believe he had told Meghan he doesn't wish to share who said whatever they may have said.

There is nothing wrong with her saying of an incident which clearly happened (if it didn't, she'd never know as Harry would've had nothing to tell her) and if they both made a choice to not declare who it was, that was their decision to make.

Lets entertain an alternate reality where they named the person and Harry then said exactly what they said... Would that be proof enough for you? Would that have made you believe them? I doubt it.

edit: I'm not saying everything the pair of them say should be taken as gospel and not questioned and I'm sure some aspects of the interview probably had some sort of artistic license used but there is no smoke without fire.
 
How am I wrong? Did Harry not sit there on that chair and say he wouldn't reveal who said it? Am I making that up?

Harry had just as much of a chance as Meghan to say who said and what they said but he decided not to. The fact he refused to say who said anything leads me to believe he had told Meghan he doesn't wish to share who said whatever they may have said.

There is nothing wrong with her saying of an incident which clearly happened (if it didn't, she'd never know as Harry would've had nothing to tell her) and if they both made a choice to not declare who it was, that was their decision to make.

Lets entertain an alternate reality where they named the person and Harry then said exactly what they said... Would that be proof enough for you? Would that have made you believe them? I doubt it.

You are wrong in that you think it was Harry's choice to reveal it. Meghan reveal the conversation, SHE SHOULD BE THE ONE RESPONSIBLE FOR TELLING THE WORLD WHAT HAPPENED. not Harry.

As I have pointed out to you, Harry didnt reveal it probably becuase it was untrue what Meghan said (the comment was racially charged). If it was true, the fact that he revealed his dad isnt picking up phone calls from him and he is not talking to his brother, so all very private stuff, why not bring the conversation into context.

when someone wants to hide something, it usually means they are lying or not telling the full truth.

Harry's omission to not to reveal the identity of the person and the context of the conversation has NOTHING to do with protection that person. He and Meghan has done the rounds on everyone from the Quene to Kate Middleton.

first 15min - Kate Middleton is a back stabbing bitch that caused the press to twist the sob story against me or didnt do anything to stop it.

next 15min mentle health - I went to some of the most senior members of the family - who do you think that is - Queen, Duke, Charles, Will take your pick, and none of them offered help

next 15min protection - i shouldn't believed them when they said they would protect me and in fact they did every in their power to make things worse for me - so the entire royal family other than me and harry are C&&NTS cos they all made my life a living hell and

then racism

So there is nothing left for them not to do. If he does say what the truth is, then there is only one reason, it is a lie or an exergerated truth.
 
So there is absolutely no chance Harry asked his wife to not mention the name?

Ok, you're right. Evil Meghan.
that makes bugger all sense. why would harry deputise Meghan to tell the story and ask her not to mention the names willingly?

If that story is that important to the both of them and if it is true, Harry would want to lay it out to the world himself ie the person who was an actual witness to the conversation as opposed to a third party. I would think that would have a world more impact and credibility then.

I would think there will be a lot less of this debate if Harry is the one who broke the news not Meghan right.

So ya Evil Meghan wanted to play the hurt mixed race woman card...
 
If the idea that Harry asked Meghan to not reveal a name is too far-fetched then I suppose we can just agree to disagree.

So I guess it's back to saying she played the race card cause it clearly is a 100% fabricated story. Good on her because she's played a blinder as it's got right under a lot of your skin.
Well played, Meghan. Well played.
 
Anyone know what the latest situation is with Harry and Meghan's ex staff who have raised grievances about how they were treated by the couple.

I know very little about the situation but it would be interesting to hear their ex employees story.
 
Anyone know what the latest situation is with Harry and Meghan's ex staff who have raised grievances about how they were treated by the couple.

I know very little about the situation but it would be interesting to hear their ex employees story.
Ive heard they have mysteriously disappeared. Friends and family members are very concerned.
 
If the idea that Harry asked Meghan to not reveal a name is too far-fetched then I suppose we can just agree to disagree.

Its hardly far fetched is it but mud slinging with no evidence is usually frowned upon. Now they have created the 'who is the royal racist' game.
 
Back
Top Bottom