Keeping up with the Markles

It seems to me that this Markle vs the Royal Family thing is a heaven send for the internet and people in general. People love to bicker and argue and get "behind their side" , for years now we've had Brexit and Trump for people to take sides over and bicker and argue why their side is right and the other side is wrong but now with Brexit falling away and Trump gone the net and people needed a new focus to strap their argument flags too and Markle v Royal Family has come at the perfect time for line-drawers to rally their words behind. I mean its been there simmering for a while but this interview and all the furore surrounding it has really made it prime bickering material :D
 
Tony Edwards said:
They love the royals out there
Click to expand...
well netflix crown (downtown .. bridgerton etc) has probably had a stronger influence than reality on their opinion, controversial golden globes & viewing figures considered;
Meghan is riding on that publicity wave; it's now like Last Action hero, with Meghan crossing from celluloid into real life
 
So this is a straight-up lie - this isn't down to convention, it's literally written down and their son doesn't qualify, no convention was changed there:


But now it's going to be put across as the UK royal Family didn't want to give HRH to the first "prince of colour" etc..

this is bad for the Royals - how dumb is whichever family member asked about this if this is true:

"There were concerns and conversations about how dark [Archie's] skin might be..."

That was relayed to me from Harry from conversations that family had with him :eek::eek::eek:

 
Last edited:
Lol are you really surprised that someone from the kind of family that pals round with Epstein even post conviction for child sex trafficking, isn’t also some wild eugenicist and concerned about skin tone of children?
 
hurfdurf said:
Lol are you really surprised that someone from the kind of family that pals round with Epstein even post conviction for child sex trafficking, isn’t also some wild eugenicist and concerned about skin tone of children?
Click to expand...

Dunno whether to believe it or not tbh... given she's just told a straight-up lie immediately before it, re: convention being changed for the first baby of color... playing off the race thing - it's clearly got a bunch of people riled up in the comments/quote tweets. Given that is an easily verifiable lie then is she trustworthy re: what she says about rumors.

Likewise, re: security for Archie - the Queen has grandchildren who don't have security provided - including Prince Andrew's daughters who are both HRHs, they're not working Royals so they don't get it.

So she's lied about one thing, misrepresented another and then immediately after we get this other race-related accusation based on something she apparently didn't witness but was told by Harry (conveniently he'd not joined her yet).
 
dowie said:
Dunno whether to believe it or not tbh... given she's just told a straight-up lie immediately before it, re: convention being changed for the first baby of color... playing off the race thing - it's clearly got a bunch of people riled up in the comments/quote tweets. Given that is an easily verifiable lie then is she trustworthy re: what she says about rumors.

Likewise, re: security for Archie - the Queen has grandchildren who don't have security provided - including Prince Andrew's daughters who are both HRHs, they're not working Royals so they don't get it.

So she's lied about one thing, misrepresented another and then immediately after we get this other race-related accusation based on something she apparently didn't witness but was told by Harry (conveniently he'd not joined her yet).
Click to expand...

I’m trusting her over the family and institution that protects an accused sex offending pedophile
 
hurfdurf said:
I’m trusting her over the family and institution that protects an accused sex offending pedophile
Click to expand...

You're trusting her after she just told a clear lie immediately beforehand in order to play up some race angle?

Protecting a nonce is different from them supposedly openly discussing the colour of the skin of Harry's child in front of him as though it's some sort of issue etc..

hurfdurf said:
And just so it’s clear how on side the British media are, complicit in the cover up.

Click to expand...

That makes no sense too - what cover-up are the British media involved in here?

What has Andrew done recently that would warrant press coverage? His TV interview was back in 2019.
 
dowie said:
You're trusting her after she just told a clear lie immediately beforehand in order to play up some race angle?

Protecting a nonce is different from them supposedly openly discussing the colour of the skin of Harry's child in front of him as though it's some sort of issue etc..
Click to expand...

I trust her opinion over nonce protectors yes, even if she doesn’t have the exact latest security guidelines. Fairly sure the Queens great grandchildren would be offered some level of care from the firm.
 
hurfdurf said:
I trust her opinion over nonce protectors yes, even if she doesn’t have the exact latest security guidelines. Fairly sure the Queens great grandchildren would be offered some level of care from the firm.
Click to expand...

The Queen has several grandchildren who aren't! Why would you be sure that one of her great-grandchildren would be?

Anyway, the lie was re: Archie's not being a Prince....

If they want him to have a title why aren't they using one of his dad's lesser titles as a courtesy title - he'd be addressed as an Earl currently.
 
dowie said:
The Queen has several grandchildren who aren't! Why would you be sure that one of her great-grandchildren would be?

Anyway, the lie was re: Archie's not being a Prince....

If they want him to have a title why aren't they using one of his dad's lesser titles as a courtesy title - he'd be addressed as an Earl currently.
Click to expand...

Because she probably isn’t as familiar with boot licking protocol as you seem to be? :p;)

I just assumed, directly in line to the thrown to some degree = Prince.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom