Soldato
- Joined
- 13 Apr 2013
- Posts
- 12,996
- Location
- La France
In other news, can someone please let the US MSM know that Jacob Blake, the chap who’s shooting by the Kenosha police sparked the riots in the first place is still alive?
You are such a weak poster. Partial quoting because you have nothing else. So 16 year old are sent out to patrol the streets with live weapons are they? No they aren't. Off back into your rabbit hole of nonsense deuse.
Please quote us that actual law then deuse. The statute that Biden can be sued under for not actually calling Rittenhouse anything. Please quote the exceptions to that statute as well. We'll wait.
My wordDo your own home work lazy.
These lifties want to be spoon fed all the time.
Wonder if they eat with knives and forks yet.
In other news, can someone please let the US MSM know that Jacob Blake, the chap who’s shooting by the Kenosha police sparked the riots in the first place is still alive?
Amazing to see this from Channel 4, it starts off OKish (just minor bias against rittenhouse), but the second half with the reporter talking to camera is staggeringly biased and contradicts many facts brought out in the case..
Hey while you're here - which poster were you before? I did ask in this and another thread but perhaps you missed it? *it is a mystery*Only if they add that he was in the process of kidnapping someone, had a knife and had already been tasered twice. That whole incident was just nuts.
Only if they add that he was in the process of kidnapping someone, had a knife and had already been tasered twice. That whole incident was just nuts.
Would you at least agree that a President of the United States calling Rittenhouse a "white supremacist" with literally no evidence of such a thing is unfair?Please quote us that actual law then deuse. The statute that Biden can be sued under for not actually calling Rittenhouse anything. Please quote the exceptions to that statute as well. We'll wait.
A sitting president cant be sued for what he said, otherwise trump would have had indictments coming out of his ears for all the perceived bad things some folks didn't like him saying.Do your own home work lazy.
These lifties want to be spoon fed all the time.
Wonder if they eat with knives and forks yet.
A sitting president cant be sued for what he said, otherwise trump would have had indictments coming out of his ears for all the perceived bad things he said.
That being said, it's incredibly reckless of him to label someone a white supremacist without any evidence.
Not for a sitting president it's not, they are essentially immune.As I've said. It's actionable in the US law.
I can't imagine what Kyle's life will be like from here on in, putting politics to one side which appears hard for some of our more frequent posters. His legal rep seems to suggest he'll need to move house, probably the area, and he'll always be 'that' Kyle. I think he escaped one sentence but probably has another one about to start.
e: hmm, just read that back and it sounded to me like I was endorsing his actions. I absolutely am not but he's a child and his life is now fubard.
Not for a sitting president it's not, they are essentially immune.
It could be argued that he was just running for president at the time, but that's incredibly murkey waters
I haven't been following this case closely but saw the BBC news article today and was surprised. I'll admit I thought it was some right wing white gun nutjob who had shot a couple of black guys, thanks to the way it was reported.