Kyle Rittenhouse - teen who shot three people in Kenosha

Moley said:
I'll never have that problem. :)
Click to expand...
Why is that if you don't mind me asking (assume medical/work or you've done so many - you unlocked an achievement ;))? For the people I know, it sounds a right pain when it comes to interfering with work. I think an old boss of mine got called up twice in not that long a period.
 
Johno please? said:
Its quite obvious to any rational thinking person thats seen all the evidence knows who the "provoker" was, it wasnt the person minding his own business with the gun, it was the guy chasing him, and after having a rifle pointed directly at you STILL contiune to chase until you lunge for the gun and get shot, I do believe the term "**** around and find out" is applicable.
Click to expand...
Right, but the question is whether the kid LARPing was enough of an issue to be the cause of self defence being required. The balance of probability is that it was in any sane persons mind.
 
C Kent said:
"She was wearing a short skirt"
Click to expand...
:cry::cry::cry: good deflection. Not quite the same though is it? Like if LARPed as law enforcement at say, a millwall football match, I really would say I was asking for it.

Johno please? said:
Shooting a child molesting criminal whos chasing you is self defense I agree, glad to see you change your mind, well done, its not an easy thing to do.
Click to expand...
?? Self defence law is wider than just the act of killing someone.
 
dLockers said:
:cry::cry::cry: good deflection. Not quite the same though is it? Like if LARPed as law enforcement at say, a millwall football match, I really would say I was asking for it.
Click to expand...
Back to your favourite word again?

You seem to be saying because of how he was dressed that gave people the right to assault him/chase him aka he deserved it because of how he was dressed..
 
C Kent said:
He may be a dick, doesnt distract from the shenanigans of the prosecution in holding back vital evidence does it, especially when that evidence blows apart their claim that Rittenhouse 'provoked' Rosenbaum and that's why he was chasing him. The grainy footage and then subsequent claim it was his gun that was pointed is complete rubbish as shown in the higher Def video.

The usual tactic of attack the person rather than the info that's presented in the tweet isn't at all relevant and yet it's hardly surprising that it's someone with a left leaning viewpoints go to move. Tbh I'm surprised you didn't 'lol daily mail right wing bias' in your post.
Click to expand...

of course the messenger matters. There is endless CT nonsense on covid, it’s origins, the vaccine and several treatments that have not gone through clinical trials, yet are spouted on social media and believed by millions. This story may well be true but I’ll believe it when a serious journalist or press agency fact checks it and publishes it. And no the Daily Mail doesn’t qualify. The idea that the messenger doesn’t matter is a major factor why everything is so ******!!! The messenger and their trustworthiness is vital to whether it should be taken seriously and that guy is a complete loon.
 
Colonel_Klinck said:
of course the messenger matters. There is endless CT nonsense on covid, it’s origins, the vaccine and several treatments that have not gone through clinical trials, yet are spouted on social media and believed by millions. This story may well be true but I’ll believe it when a serious journalist or press agency fact checks it and publishes it. And no the Daily Mail doesn’t qualify. The idea that the messenger doesn’t matter is a major factor why everything is so ******!!! The messenger and their trustworthiness is vital to whether it should be taken seriously and that guy is a complete loon.
Click to expand...

The DM article is literally just reporting on the court documentation that shows the motion to declare a mistrial with prejudice as the prosecution withheld evidence, there's no opinion or misrepresentation/distortion of the facts involved. The same with the tweet, it shows the video given to the defence, the video that was used throughout the trial and then shows the HD version that was used by the prosecution in the closing arguments- after submissions of evidence was closed.

As to your claims of serious journalist or a press agency fact check:- the likes of the BBC/Guardian/CNN/NBC/MSNBC have all been major players in misinformation or just plain incorrect facts regarding this case. I'm still seeing news anchors for those stations that are tweeting incorrect information about this case, "crossing state lines with a weapon illegally" etc and fanning the flames of racial division by tweeting nonsense like what would happen if a black 17 year old crossed state lines and killed etc. Hell until recently plenty of idiots thought Rittenhouse had killed a black guy due to the white supremist nonsense the msm were pushing, there's folks that probably still do.

Some of the biggest misinformation/ or incorrect stories in recent times have been perpetrated by the MSM you claim to be the bastions of trustworthiness (Covington/Smollett).
 
Colonel_Klinck said:
of course the messenger matters. There is endless CT nonsense on covid, it’s origins, the vaccine and several treatments that have not gone through clinical trials, yet are spouted on social media and believed by millions. This story may well be true but I’ll believe it when a serious journalist or press agency fact checks it and publishes it. And no the Daily Mail doesn’t qualify. The idea that the messenger doesn’t matter is a major factor why everything is so ******!!! The messenger and their trustworthiness is vital to whether it should be taken seriously and that guy is a complete loon.
Click to expand...


:cry::cry::cry::cry: it's a court document that says it :cry::cry::cry:

You're getting really bad. Looking at your SC posting.
It's understandable.
 
C Kent said:
The DM article is literally just reporting on the court documentation that shows the motion to declare a mistrial with prejudice as the prosecution withheld evidence, there's no opinion or misrepresentation/distortion of the facts involved. The same with the tweet, it shows the video given to the defence, the video that was used throughout the trial and then shows the HD version that was used by the prosecution in the closing arguments- after submissions of evidence was closed.

As to your claims of serious journalist or a press agency fact check:- the likes of the BBC/Guardian/CNN/NBC/MSNBC have all been major players in misinformation or just plain incorrect facts regarding this case. I'm still seeing news anchors for those stations that are tweeting incorrect information about this case, "crossing state lines with a weapon illegally" etc and fanning the flames of racial division by tweeting nonsense like what would happen if a black 17 year old crossed state lines and killed etc. Hell until recently plenty of idiots thought Rittenhouse had killed a black guy due to the white supremist nonsense the msm were pushing, there's folks that probably still do.

Some of the biggest misinformation/ or incorrect stories in recent times have been perpetrated by the MSM you claim to be the bastions of trustworthiness (Covington/Smollett).
Click to expand...

I like how you only list news organisations that are believed to have a left lean. And the idea that Covington was one of the biggest misinformation stories of the last few years is laughable. That story is small fry except to those involved where it become the best day of their lives as they are now set for life money wise. And are you joking putting Smollett in there? Of all the fake news and misinformation we've had over the last 6 or so years you'd put that story up there :cry:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom