Soo... Are we dead yet? Someone was saying this thing was getting fired up tday or is there a lead time before they start smashing particles together?
welll.....i think we is still alive, told you,. nothing to fear, but fear itself
The LSAG report says that the possibility of strangelets being produced is less than that of the RHIC. Apparently this is because that they are only really stable at low temperatures and because the LHC is operating at a much, much higher it's not possible.
The report says that strangelets are only bound in the 10-100MeV region. The LHC is, as you probably know, going to be operating at 14TeV. Ergo, the report argues, that due to the nature of the energy involved, that the second law of thermodynamics precludes the formation of a cold condensate that is orders of magnitude cooler than the surrounding medium.
All of this can be read here: http://lsag.web.cern.ch/lsag/LSAG-Report_add.pdf
Anyone who is worried and fancies a read, can see here: http://lsag.web.cern.ch/lsag/LSAG-Report.pdf
It's not turned on untill September
Or am i wrong.
If we entered a black hole, could we actually transition from space time to time space?
From the various scientific and fringe stuff i've come across in my time i reckon theres a possibility, first 2012 is predicted to be an event and many possibilities seem to exist for it, that means either no one knows and is just guessing or its some point in space time where things change and all possibilities can happen.
Black holes are not well understood but are probably like an inversion of space time, perhaps its time space on the other side which can give rise to infinite possibilities, an observer supposedly has some effect on reality in quantum physics so if the human being enters, then due to the quantum physics all events can happen and will if the observer chooses consciously or subconsciously.
Ideas like the technological singularity and time wave zero suggest an event could happen, maybe even should happen given time, perhaps in 2012 after the machine has been on for sometime one or more black holes will collect within the earth and grow in size to change us from space time to time space where all possibilities are created by the observer.
What do you think?
No you're right; they're not going to be crunching protons until September.
If black holes can be created and if black holes don't evaporate (bare in mind that the theory that exists that says they might be created also says that they must evaporate, there is no theory that says they will be created and stable) gravitated to the centre of the Earth, the acceretion time would be about 5 million years. They would "eat" matter that slowly.
So, in effect, what you're talking about is very close to impossible.
CERN has a launch party planned for October 21st, which is about the rough time they will start actually colliding particles.
It won't be for a while til it hits full power, though.
Personally - I love the idea behind who was sponsoring the court case to stop the LHC... US energy and accelerator labs...
I'm sure there's no alternate agenda there..
The lhc might spit out loads of black holes at these energy levels and beam intensity, it might be exponential once you start with a few.
My bad! Stop showing me up![]()
It might, yes. But the chances are beyond slim. It won't be exponential, otherwise denser bodies (neutron stars and white dwarfs etc) in the universe would have problems through the same mechanism you're talking about.
Ok but what about the effects of this kind of black hole, as it could only have the earths mavity at most and would take time to suck everything in, would things be ripped apart or would there be time for matter to be compressed first without quite as much destructiveness as you would expect, also what about a possible change from space time to time space?
Yeah, it would take time to suck everything in. It'd take about 5 million years, as I said. That is, of course, if it's even possible in the first place. Things would be spaghettified. Which, I presume, would be no fun at all.
I can't say I've ever heard of "time space", though. I'm not expert here, but I've never come across the term. Either way, no one knows what could happen because a black hole has never been seen...
I think it would happen a lot quicker than 5 million years when you take time dilation into account, perhaps to an outside observer it would take that long but to us it should be much quicker, we won't know at first so the lhc may well build them up in the earth without ever knowing to stop, remember theres no guarantees hawking radiation will work fast enough if at all, if you invert space time then it seems possible your get time space but of course no one knows for sure what happens in a black hole, the whole universe could be within one for all we know, all just theories and ideas though.
Yeah, it would take time to suck everything in. It'd take about 5 million years, as I said. That is, of course, if it's even possible in the first place. Things would be spaghettified. Which, I presume, would be no fun at all.
Everything is basically being compressed into a singularity though, so it's a lot of matter being compressed into an extremely small space all at the same time. The gravitational force is huge.Thinking about it spaghettification is doubtful, take time dilation, things within experience time like normal, space would be the same, if mavity is the bending of space, things within would be ok but may appear to be stretching, i doubt things would tear apart because as space is stretching so to is everything else but not in a destructive way otherwise the universe expanding would have a similar effect surely?
Black holes have so much mass concentrated into a very small radius that the gravitational force near them is enormous. Since a black hole has no solid surface, as an object approaches, the distances between the black hole and the nearest and farthest edges of the object are significantly different, in percentage terms. In other words, the total distance from the black hole to the nearest part of the object becomes comparable to the dimensions of the object itself. For this reason, the gradient of the gravitional field across the object is very large. Thus, the difference in gravitational pull between the nearest and furthest parts of the falling object is sufficient to cause spaghettification.