Laurence Fox
- Thread starter Amplus
- Start date
Soldato
The more I look at it, he pretty much is 100% at fault.. The muppet did this so publicly that it had to be brough to the Police's attention and what do they do?
The police raid to look for evidence is fairly normal, they need to search/seize as much as they can quickly, I've seen other instances of raids to gather evidence, it's always a van full of coppers..
And of course they want his phone/iPads etc.. they will be looking for evidence of colluding with others for the stated potential crime..
The police raid to look for evidence is fairly normal, they need to search/seize as much as they can quickly, I've seen other instances of raids to gather evidence, it's always a van full of coppers..
And of course they want his phone/iPads etc.. they will be looking for evidence of colluding with others for the stated potential crime..
Soldato
- Joined
- 13 Sep 2005
- Posts
- 4,345
Big ol self own there for Lawrence. No idea why he thought that was a good idea.
Soldato
The law hasn't been applied equally to everyone. It could be said that the unevenness is feeding the culture war.
Why hasn't Chris Peckham been arrested? He literally had a programme called "Is it time to break the law". In the programme he interviewed a guy who had wrote a book about blowing up pipelines. He never challenged the guy.
Why hasn't Chris Peckham been arrested? He literally had a programme called "Is it time to break the law". In the programme he interviewed a guy who had wrote a book about blowing up pipelines. He never challenged the guy.
Soldato
That was a documentary on activism. Not really comparible.
You can't arrest people for asking questions.
You can arrest people for threatening to commit a crime.
Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2005
- Posts
- 12,611
The police give him too much credit though raiding his house like he's some criminal mastermind organising gangs to cut down ULEZ cameras, he's just an idiot
Soldato
They will need evidence if he is going to be charged and that will likely be on his phone/computer/ipad etc. How else can they get this without searching his home?
Soldato
He's praising law breakers, and presenting the general question.
There are only 2 positions in this situation. Either both should be allowed to question the narrative, and express support for people who have taken the law into their own hands or neither should.
Unless it's a proscribed group it's not illegal to express support for such people.
Soldato
I was thinking the same thing, albeit the other way around, i.e. would those screaming about how JSO should be stopped also agree on this action with Fox? The only difference I can see is JSO don’t publicise their explicit actions so as to get caught.
Soldato
Did I miss something? Why are the police involved now?
Fox wants to pretend the 'deep state' is after him even though he's neither been killed nor silenced by wasting the police's time through threatening the government by damaging public property.
Soldato
Pre-crime isn't. But conspiracy is. I expect that is what he is being investigated for.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2013
- Posts
- 29,416
There's a video from the YouTube lawyer a few pages back explaining exactly why he was arrested.
It’s mostly been used against anti-monarchists and eco protesters.
Did you was the programme? His conclusion was no.
Soldato
Did you see the Communists all dressed in black marching past the Tory conference? That is illegal.
Yes I did.
Packham is smarter than Fox.