I spoke to Inet (Swedish retailer) and they will get stock in December.
Sweden can sometimes be behind with availability from what I heard. I remember one Swedish guy contemplating for over a month on whether he should order his UC98 from UK because it was easily available in countries like UK, Germany or Poland, but was nowhere to be found in Sweden
However, in normal day to day use, in typical day time ambient lighting conditions and with general uses i cannot see anything like the same level of glow that krzychowiec has reported and captured in photos like this
Day time ambient lighting is not an environment to test anything because it is hiding almost all flaws. For example 3000:1-5000:1 VA TVs that still have very poor dark room performance are looking like if they had almost a perfect black when placed in a bright living room.
I would agree with this argument if we were talking about productivity/work oriented display that is often used in bright environment and is not displaying any dark or picture quality critical content (by this I mean a need for contrast, black uniformity and etc), basically working with programs on bright backgrounds like excel or web browsing, the only thing you need there is a natural picture comfortable for the eyes and sharp fonts, so any IPS in the world really. But here we are talking about the display that is meant exactly for picture quality critical tasks, gaming or watching movies, which are often used in dark or at least darkened environment and simply need much better all around performance from the display.
Day time performance argument generally sounds like something that a poor manufacturer or retailer would use to avoid accepting an RMA or a return. Imagine telling them that you are experiencing very significant glow in dark environment, and they would reply that they don't see any glow when placing a display on a beach in the middle of sunny day. "I don't see a flaw after intentionally manipulating the environment to hide it". This is how much value the daytime argument has.
But the krzychowiec unit is from June 2018. It's also 4 months since he bought it. Is this normal? I was expecting at least August.
It is normal. For example I got my UC98 in March 2016 and it has December 2015 manufacture date. And it is not worse than younger UC98s, like some people really want to believe with 950G.
The G sample i have was manufactured Feb 2018, while the F model was manuf April 2018 for those asking.
it's an early production sample presumably for internal use, reviewing, shows etc. i assume it was produced in very small volume in Feb, and only now going in to larger mass production
A lot of people hope that my retail unit is somehow drastically worse than what they will get because it supposedly has early manufacture date, but it looks like it turns out to be quite the opposite. If the actually early units, like the ones you got for review, were in fact manufactured before mass production started, and they were manufactured for internal use, show and review purposes then you can suspect that they were manufactured much more carefully, and if not then they most certainly got through way more QC and selection. All of this before starting to cut corners with mass production.
So if you ask yourself a question what is more representative of what you get from actual market, pre-production units manufactured early before mass production and specifically for the purpose of internal use, shows and reviews, or actual retail unit manufactured during mass production, the answer doesn't seem very hard.
Thats of course only a speculation, based on no actual data or information, so it may just be a bs.
After looking at my very old 30" IPS screen the same way (side angles) I also see the weird glow as reported here. It is my conclusion that the glow is normal IPS glow and not backlight bleed. Backlight bleed would be mainly visible straight from the front, but in the images and video it is not.
Again, ignoring the direct comparisons I have posted. The glow for IPS is normal, but this amount of glow is certainly not normal. It is in line with the worst glow panels.
Also the pictures are not taken from any extreme angle or anything like this. I am just sitting a bit further away than normally to put the camera at my normal viewing distance, putting camera before my eyes and just looking left or right. What you see on the pictures is what you see during gaming from normal viewing position. There are also pictures for front viewing posted, and also a picture from 1.5 meters away to check the bleed which is small on unit. So what you are seeing on the pictures is mostl certainly glow and this is how it really looks, I have an LG V30 which has a good camera a quite a lot adjustments in manual mode so I took my time to make sure it is showing actual state of things and not some major overexposition. I am repeating myself like 5th time but what can you do...
![Stick Out Tongue :P :P](/styles/default/xenforo/vbSmilies/Normal/tongue.gif)