Associate
- Joined
- 13 Jun 2012
- Posts
- 367
Sure, this would be the accepted view for watching HDR video...
... and yet for gaming use specifically i have seen plenty of reviews that suggest a good implementation of HDR600 can provide an excellent visual upgrade vis-a-vis playing the same game on the same monitor in SDR.
Notably, the CRG90 has the same limited panel based local-dimming as the 38GN/38GN HDR1000 vs HDR600)...
... whereas the 38GL does not have any kind of local-dimming, and has a panel brightness only suitable for HDR400 certification.
There is even something to be said for a HDR400 monitor that also meets AMD's requirements for Freesync Premium Pro provided it has been well implemented:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WI3FXkHzu-s&feature=youtu.be&t=22m45s
I have now had my LG 38WN950-C for nearly a week, my conclusions:
1. arrived in good nick, with no damange or defects, e.g. bad pixels, backlight bleed, peeling layers
2. the picture quality is lovely - at least coming from an AOC Q3279VWF
3. in Farcry5, cycling through SDR > HDR10 > Freesync2 - it is very evident that the HDR modes are a useful and desirable visual upgrade over SDR.
4. maybe a consequence of Freesync2 low-latency pipeline, but farcry5 is incredibly 'smooth' to play even though my underclocked Vega64 must be struggling to push frames at Ultra+native-res!
HDR is not mind-blowing, or awesome, or what the cinema-gods intended, but; clearly better and in no way can it be deemed a non-feature. HDR600[+]Freesync2 in combination is a valuable addition.
n.b. i am talking here exclusively about HDR [gaming], not video or desktop.