It won't achieve 120Hz via PC though as that's not possible with HDMI 2.0... only HDMI 2.1 (which no GPU has yet), or DP 1.4, which no TV has.
The question is, do you want 1080p/1440p at 55"? I guess depends how far you're sat from it, but anything desktop based would not be ideal. Plus, you have to consider motion and lag, which is definitely going to be worse, even though IQ obviously wins out with OLED. All depends what your priorities are at the end of the day.
cheers for the answers, just thought it would be a good option rather than a big gaming display thats gonna cost over 3 grand.
If sat at the recommend viewing distance of 7+ feet, it is very hard to see the difference with games imo, desktop looks fine too, although obviously the pixels are more noticeable with text and so on.
That is surely the biggest issue though... 7ft is hardly do-able in the majority of desktop PC scenarios. For lounge gaming sure, OLED would be my preference, but not day to day at this size. Even LG's 48" OLED due next year doesn't really help much in this regard.
B9 has it also. Main difference is it has a 2018 class processor vs the new 2019 one. But this makes very little difference overall. C9 would be ideal, but if I can get a B9 say £200 cheaper, I would.It can definitely do 120HZ @ 1080P, maybe 1440P, not 100% sure about the b9 model.
Glad I waited for HDMI 2.1
Why? I'd have thought the number of games you'll ever see running at 4K 120Hz on PS5 will be counted on one hand, you certainly won't see the likes of God Of War, Spiderman and the other AAA releases at those framerates, not a chance, those releases will always prioritise graphical fidelity over framerate.
I'm glad I didn't wait!
2 years of pure bliss gaming (spiderman, rdr 2, days gone, uncharted, TLOU, HZD etc. etc.) and TV/film content!
It’s not all about the 120hz. It’s about VRR. I am sure there will be benefits to having that. Also my next PC I may even go mini itx and bring that downstairs sometimes
..ok, but I wouldn't touch an OLED screen if your going to use it for PC & console gaming, not with the 'burn in' issues they suffer from.
4k and plasma is nothing compared to OLED and HDR
My panny plasma was good but oled in a whole other league.
I am one to always wait as well and granted I probably would still have been waiting if it weren't for the good deal on the e7 I got but after having seen it in action in my own environment with the games etc. I play, I would have happily paid a lot more.
My advice is don't wait around forever otherwise you are just missing out on all the goodness that will come from current tech. now and if you see a good deal on current tvs then go for it.
2+ years with mine and heavy HDR console/pc gaming and no sign at all, not even, temporary image retention, overblown issue imo.
I have used my Plasma for over 4 years connected to my PC for media, browsing and gaming, worst that ever happened was temporary image retention that goes away in minutes of watching a tv show. My understanding is OLED deals with burn in much better, so highly doubt anything would go wrong...ok, but I wouldn't touch an OLED screen if your going to use it for PC & console gaming, not with the 'burn in' issues they suffer from.
4k and plasma is nothing compared to OLED and HDR
My panny plasma was good but oled in a whole other league.
I am one to always wait as well and granted I probably would still have been waiting if it weren't for the good deal on the e7 I got but after having seen it in action in my own environment with the games etc. I play, I would have happily paid a lot more.
My advice is don't wait around forever otherwise you are just missing out on all the goodness that will come from current tech. now and if you see a good deal on current tvs then go for it.
2+ years with mine and heavy HDR console/pc gaming and no sign at all, not even, temporary image retention, overblown issue imo.
I have seen plenty of people suffer with this though... maybe they're in the minority, maybe not, impossible to know for the most part. Overblown issue perhaps, but it's definitely not a myth anyway. I've seen examples of image retention after just a few hours of use, and while that may not be permanent, it certainly would be annoying if you then went on to another task and still saw that retained image (even if it did go away eventually).
I have seen plenty of people suffer with this though... maybe they're in the minority, maybe not, impossible to know for the most part. Overblown issue perhaps, but it's definitely not a myth anyway. I've seen examples of image retention after just a few hours of use, and while that may not be permanent, it certainly would be annoying if you then went on to another task and still saw that retained image (even if it did go away eventually).
I read that panel quality/lottery could play a role in this? I am not bothered about image retention if it is no worse than my Plasma. Honestly I have got to a point now that I don’t even see it or let it bother me as it goes away so quickly. My main issue with Plasma is how much energy it uses and how hot it gets.