Liverpool Takeover Thread

M0T

M0T

Soldato
Joined
23 Aug 2003
Posts
4,582
Location
House
Do companies not sell debt all the time? I wasn't aware that the company had to be in administration for this to happen.
 
Don
Joined
9 Jun 2004
Posts
46,566
Ok a quick summary:

-Mill Financial are already effective owners of Gillett's 50% and reportedly are in negotiations with Hicks to buy all or part of his share.

-It's unclear whether Mill Financial can complete any transaction without the approval of the Liverpool board.

-Hicks' own TRO prevents him from selling to Mill Financial.

So, Hicks has had to drop his TRO in order to make it possible for him to do any deal with Mill but this opens the door to NESV to complete its deal.

So assuming the Mill/Hicks rumours are true and that the deal can go ahead without the board approval, it's now a race between NESV and Mill to conclude the deal and repay RBS.
 
Don
Joined
9 Jun 2004
Posts
46,566
LFC Statement:
Liverpool Football Club have issued this statement following the court hearing in London this morning:

We are delighted that the court has clarified the issue of board composition and has removed the uncertainty around the sale process.

We will now be consulting with our lawyers and planning for a board meeting tonight. A further statement will be made in due course.
http://www.liverpoolfc.tv/news/latest-news/liverpool-fc-statement-6

We were in court this morning again? :confused:
 
Don
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
41,830
Location
Notts
Dan Roan
I'm told deal between Hicks and Mill is done -it's whether the transaction's technical paperwork and legal details can be processed in time
 
Don
Joined
9 Jun 2004
Posts
46,566
Dan Roan
I'm told deal between Hicks and Mill is done -it's whether the transaction's technical paperwork and legal details can be processed in time

It's not just a matter of time. Presuming that any deal they've done is at the highest level of the holding companies, it's still massively unclear if Mill can become owners of LFC, repay the RBS etc without board approval.
 
Associate
Joined
1 Sep 2004
Posts
1,605
Location
Northants
Did the board give approval for Gillett to sell his shares to Mill Financial? Or did they automatical take control of his 50% because thats who he owed the money to and defaulted on the payments?
 
Don
Joined
9 Jun 2004
Posts
46,566
No it isn't unclear. Hicks cannot sell his shares without the approval of the board.

Hicks can sell shares in Kop Football LLP(the ultimate holding company) with owns Kop Holdings (through a Cayman's company), which owns LFC.

The restrictions on H&G from RBS are from Kop Holdings downwards.

Hicks can sell shares in Kop Football but RBS still have control from Kop Holdings downwards and it would be unclear if they can refuse to accept Mill repaying them without the board agreeing.
 
Don
Joined
9 Jun 2004
Posts
46,566
If the TRO has been lifted then surly the club has already been sold to NESV as that was the only thing holding up the deal?

It's possible that the TRO can't officially be lifted until the Court opens in Dallas.

Broughton's just been chased into Slaughter and May's offices by the press and said he's very confident and gave a thumbs up.
 
Don
Joined
9 Jun 2004
Posts
46,566
If Huang is behind the Mill stuff as being suggested then that makes things very interesting

The Huang/Mill link can't be dismissed and therefore wouldn't necessarily automatically make the sale to them negative but there's too many uncertainties.
 
Caporegime
Joined
25 Jul 2003
Posts
40,134
Location
FR+UK
Hicks can sell shares in Kop Football but RBS still have control from Kop Holdings downwards and it would be unclear if they can refuse to accept Mill repaying them without the board agreeing.

It still rests on RBS accepting a bid from Mill Financial. And looking at it for a second, would RBS really risk the wrath of Liverpool fans worldwide? I realise they're a bank after profit, but they also look at things like this from a wider perspective, and wouldn't want to create the ill will towards themselves this would create, surely?
 
Back
Top Bottom