London Bridge Incident

Tefal said:
well shes right isnt she.

most of the radicalization is happening through the internet not mosques.

so surely all of you calling for action, change, DO SOMETHING!!! should be in full support of locking dow the internet?

after all better than than locking up people or deporting their parents no?



or do we hit the real rub, you care about them tackling radicalisation through the internet because it will affect you?

iirc all the of the uk islamic attacks inthe last decade have been radicalized by information they found on the internet?
Click to expand...


Yes agree, tackling the internet is a very important aspect.
 
Prime minister said "Enough is Enough."

And she actually called out the ideology as well.
 
The Internet needs to take more responsibility :)

Dear Theresa, The Internet isn't a centralised organisation. Lunatics need to take more responsibility for being lunatics.
 
scorza said:
So why have places like Germany, who haven't been bombing anyone, been targeting by Islamic terror attacks? We need to understand these reasons and also understand the reasons why places like Poland, Hungary, Chile and Japan - some of whom have been involved in middle-eastern interventions - have not been targeted.
Click to expand...

Because they have a negligible Muslim population. Goes without saying that less Muslims in a country = less chance of Islamic related attacks.
 
koolpc said:
I believe that the only way of getting a solid grip on this terrorism in our country is if the muslim population grow some balls and eradicate from within. They need to clean out from within.
Click to expand...

It is true. We ALL need to locate this. The deep tunnels of Islam are unclear and we will need guides.
 
Tefal said:
yes the people who i brought that argument up to.

just like my argument for car deaths isnt ban all cars.
Click to expand...


o hang on cars kill about 2,000 people in the uk a year, you got used to that, buit something that kills less than 100 you want to fundamentally change our way of life for the worse?
Click to expand...

Why did you bring it up then as a suggested legitimate comparison? Were you highlighting the ridiculousness of those other things? (1,2,3) With a counter proposal equally ridiculous to make your point? If so then ok i should have seen that earlier.

RIP to those who died in this terrible attack. I dont think this thread will last long.
 
bingham67 said:
I get your point but intelligence has failed in this and the Manchester attack now
Click to expand...

And we don't know how many times it has been successful. Doing "something else" just because it's not been tried yet doesn't seem like a clear strategy. If people want to murder civilians in UK cities then they will find a way, it's not something you can really prevent with barriers.
 
Tefal said:
well shes right isnt she.

most of the radicalization is happening through the internet not mosques.

so surely all of you calling for action, change, DO SOMETHING!!! should be in full support of locking dow the internet?

after all better than than locking up people or deporting their parents no?



or do we hit the real rub, you care about them tackling radicalisation through the internet because it will affect you?

iirc all the of the uk islamic attacks inthe last decade have been radicalized by information they found on the internet?
Click to expand...

What are you actually talking about? How would them tackling radicalisation through the internet affect me? Are you suggesting i'm a terrorist in the works?

It's hard to understand the point of your post.
 
diamount said:
Because they have a negligible Muslim population. Goes without saying that less Muslims in a country = less chance of Islamic related attacks.
Click to expand...
He knows this but keeps asking the same question, basicly a sly way of blaming the muslim populations of the affected country's
 
MrKnifey said:
The more I listen to May the more I think this is a setup of some sort, it just seems to be setting us up for more surveillance, regulated internet and a government realection... sounds mad for me to even say it but it's the feeling I'm getting!!
Click to expand...

You won't be the first to have thought that on here. Your username is rather unfortunate
 
I'm more worried about what May will do/try to do to our free speech and the internet then I am about being caught up in a terror attack.

Rip to those that have lost there lives last night and hopefully those injured will pull though.
 
NewGamer11 said:
The Internet needs to take more responsibility :)

Dear Theresa, The Internet isn't a centralised organisation. Lunatics need to take more responsibility for being lunatics.
Click to expand...


and yet people keep saying this about muslims?

how they need to take responsibility?
 
MrKnifey said:
The more I listen to May the more I think this is a setup of some sort, it just seems to be setting us up for more surveillance, regulated internet and a government realection... sounds mad for me to even say it but it's the feeling I'm getting!!
Click to expand...

I think you've just won the 'most unsuitable username posting in this thread' Internet award :p
 
badgeruk said:
I'm more worried about what May will do/try to do to our free speech and the internet then I am about being caught up in a terror attack.

Rip to those that have lost there lives last night and hopefully those injured will pull though.
Click to expand...

You worry about free speech, yet happily post on this forum? How do you reconcile that?
 
McBain said:
What are you actually talking about? How would them tackling radicalisation through the internet affect me? Are you suggesting i'm a terrorist in the works?

It's hard to understand the point of your post.
Click to expand...

Because in order to properly do that you need a cut down internet access like china. Pretty sure that will affect you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom